Thursday, 2 September 2010

Third Generation Map of Human Genetic Variation Published

Map adds data from seven global populations
Thursday, 02 September 2010

An international consortium today published a third-generation map of human genetic variation, called the HapMap, which includes data from an additional seven global populations, increasing the total number to 11 populations. The improved resolution will help researchers interpret current genome studies aimed at finding common and rarer genetic variants associated with complex diseases.

Any two humans are more than 99 percent the same at the genetic level. But, the small fraction of genetic material that varies among people can help explain individual differences in susceptibility to disease, response to drugs or reaction to environmental factors. Variation in the human genome is organized into local neighbourhoods called haplotypes, which usually are inherited as intact blocks of DNA sequence information. Consequently, researchers refer to the map of human genetic variation as a haplotype map, or HapMap.

"The generated HapMap provides an important foundation for studies aiming to find genetic variation related to human diseases. It is now routinely used by researchers as a valuable reference tool in our quest to use genomics for improving human health," said Eric D. Green, M.D., Ph.D., director of the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), a part of the National Institutes of Health, which provided major funding for the HapMap Project.

The most common genetic differences among people are SNPs, single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Each SNP reflects a specific position in the genome where the DNA spelling differs by one letter in different people. SNPs serve as landmarks across the genome. The initial version of the HapMap contained approximately 1 million SNPs, and the second-generation map brought that total to more than 3.1 million SNPs. Over the last few years, researchers conducting genome-wide association studies have relied on publicly available data from the HapMap to discover hundreds of common genetic variants associated with complex human diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer and many other health conditions.

The first- and second-generation versions of HapMap resulted from the analysis of DNA collected from 270 volunteers from four geographically diverse populations: Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria; Japanese in Tokyo; Han Chinese in Beijing; and Utah residents with ancestry from northern and western Europe.

The third-generation HapMap, reported in the Sept. 2 issue of the journal Nature, is the largest survey of human genetic variation performed thus far. It has data on 1,184 people, including the initial HapMap samples. Additional human samples were collected from the original populations and from seven new populations: individuals of African ancestry from the Southwestern United States; Chinese individuals from metropolitan Denver; Gujarati Indians from Houston; Luhya people from Webuye, Kenya; Maasai people from Kinyawa, Kenya; individuals of Mexican ancestry from Los Angeles; and individuals from Tuscany, Italy. No medical or personal identifying information was obtained from the HapMap donors. However, the samples are identified by the population from which they were collected.

Researchers analyzed approximately 1.6 million SNPs in about 500 samples from the four original populations and more than 650 samples from the seven new populations. In addition, the consortium sequenced 10 regions totalling about 1 million base pairs in 692 samples from this set in 10 of the 11 populations. More than 800 copy-number variants, where people have different numbers of copies of genomic regions, were also added to the resource.

As expected, the increased number of samples allows detection of variants that are much rarer than could be found by the earlier HapMaps. Because of human population history, lower-frequency variation is shared less among populations. For instance, 77 percent of the detected SNPs were new, revealing that many more variants remain to be found, especially rare variants.

In addition, the larger scale of the new dataset reinforces the result found by previous smaller studies that non-African diversity is largely a subset of African diversity. The researchers also found that the third-generation HapMap increases the power to identify signals of natural selection — variants that increased rapidly in frequency very recently in some populations because they were somehow beneficial to human health.

The researchers assessed the latest generation HapMap for its ability to predict SNPs in other populations. They found that using one population to predict another population's variants works for common variants and for some less-common variants in related populations. However, it does not work well for rare variants in related populations, meaning that rare variants are likely to make much more population-specific contributions to disease. This finding underscores the value of efforts already underway that use efficient 'next-generation' DNA sequencing technologies to sequence large numbers of whole genomes within various populations to find rare variants that contribute to disease.

Many of the HapMap researchers are part of the 1000 Genomes Project, an international public-private consortium launched in 2008 that is building an even more detailed map of human genetic variation. Project researchers are currently using next-generation DNA sequencing technologies to build a public database containing information from the complete genomes of 2,500 people from 27 populations around the world, many of which were studied in the HapMap project. Disease researchers will be able to use the catalogue, which is being developed over the next two years, in their studies of the contribution of common and rarer genetic variation to illness.

The Consortium that produced this latest HapMap included researchers Baylor College of Medicine in Houston; the Broad Institute in Cambridge, Mass.; and the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in Hinxton, Cambridge, England. Collaborating researchers worked at Arizona State University, Tempe; Baylor College of Medicine. Houston; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland; Howard University, Washington, D.C.; the Institute for Oncological Study and Prevention, Florence, Italy; Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya; the University of California, Los Angeles; the University of California, San Francisco; the University of Houston-Clear Lake; and the University of Oklahoma, Norman. Funding was provided by the NHGRI, the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, and the Wellcome Trust.

"The HapMap project has been a stellar example of how improved technologies and dedicated work on obtaining DNA samples from individuals in major populations allows us to provide more detailed resources for studies of human disease," said Richard Gibbs, Ph.D., director of the Human Genome Sequencing Center at the Baylor College of Medicine.

The International HapMap Consortium devoted considerable time and resources to try to ensure that the map was designed, developed and used in a manner that is sensitive to a wide range of ethical and social issues. In addition to getting informed consent from individual sample donors, a careful process of community engagement was conducted with each group approached to participate in the project.

Researchers can access HapMap data through the NIH National Center for Biotechnology Information.

Source: NIH/National Human Genome Research Institute
Contact: Geoff Spencer

Reference:
Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations
The International HapMap 3 Consortium
Nature Vol: 467, 52–58, (02 September 2010), doi: 10.1038/nature09298
.........


ZenMaster


For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at
http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/

People Want to be Asked before Sharing Genetic Data

Group Health study is first to ask patients about sharing their data
Thursday, 02 September 2010

People want to be informed and asked for consent before deciding whether to let researchers share their genetic information in a federal database. This is according to a team of investigators at Group Health Research Institute and the University of Washington (UW). The team's report, called "Glad You Asked," is in the September 2010 Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics.

To the team's knowledge, it is the first to ask research participants' opinions about the need for informed consent for sharing their own information. The team explored participants' preferences while collaborating on the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network. The Network involves volunteers enrolled in the joint Group Health-UW Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) study. ACT is a longitudinal cohort study that tracks aging-related changes in thousands of older Group Health patients over time.

When the team asked Group Health patients who participate in ACT whether their "de-identified" (anonymous) genetic and medical record information could be shared in the database, 86 percent said yes. Then the team surveyed 365 ACT study participants who had agreed to let their genetic information be shared, mostly because of a "desire to help others." In the survey, 90 percent of participants said they thought it was important to have been asked for this reconsent.

Reconsent means getting additional informed consent from research participants before using their information for a purpose beyond what they agreed to originally. Alternatives to reconsent — including opting out, being notified, or neither individual permission nor notification — were unacceptable to 40 percent, 67 percent, and 70 percent of the surveyed participants, respectively.

Evette J. Ludman, Ph.D..
Credit: Group Health
Research Institute.
"We were surprised that so many people felt it was important for us to ask them, even though they decided to give their consent," said lead author Evette Ludman, PhD, a senior research associate at Group Health Research Institute.

"This indicates that even if most of a study's participants would agree to data sharing, it's still crucial to ask them."

Since 2008, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has strongly encouraged many studies to submit genetic information to the federal database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP). The reason is that genomic research on large numbers of people can yield insights that are not possible with smaller numbers.

For new studies that will enrol participants prospectively, informed consent can — and should — address such sharing. But sharing genetic data raises ethical questions for longitudinal cohort studies, including ACT, which started long before dbGaP was established in 2006. Few existing informed consents address data sharing through this new mechanism. Ideally, Dr. Ludman suggested, research grants would include funding and time to pursue reconsent. In this study, it cost around $50 for each participant who was asked.

"Trust is a two-way street, and human research requires lots of trust," Dr. Ludman said.

"People have an understandable feeling of ownership over their bodies and medical records, including their genetic information," she added.

"Researchers show we're worthy of trust when we ask research participants for permission to use their information in a way that they haven't already agreed to."

Recent high-profile legal cases have highlighted the issue of consent and trust in research, including the Havasupai tribe vs. Arizona State University and parents vs. the Texas health department over storing newborn blood samples without parental consent. So too has the bestselling book, “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks”, about the history surrounding the HeLa cell line, the world's most widely grown human cells.

About:
The eMERGE Network:
The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network is a national consortium formed to develop, disseminate, and apply approaches to research that combine DNA biorepositories with electronic medical record (EMR) systems for large-scale, high-throughput genetic research. The Network brings together researchers with a wide range of expertise in genomics, statistics, ethics, informatics, and clinical medicine from leading medical research institutions across the country: Group Health Cooperative with the UW; Marshfield Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Northwestern University; and Vanderbilt University.


Group Health Research Institute:
Founded in 1947, Group Health Cooperative is a Seattle-based, consumer-governed, non-profit health care system. Group Health Research Institute changed its name from Group Health Center for Health Studies on September 8, 2009. Since 1983, the Institute has conducted non-proprietary public-interest research on preventing, diagnosing, and treating major health problems. Government and private research grants provide its main funding.


UW Medicine:
The UW Medicine health system includes UW Medical Center, Harborview Medical Center, Northwest Hospital, the UW School of Medicine, UW Medicine Neighborhood Clinics, UW Physicians, Airlift Northwest, and the UW's partnership in the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance with Seattle Children's and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. UW Medicine has major academic and service affiliations with Seattle Children's Hospital, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System in Seattle and the VA Hospital in Boise. The UW School of Medicine is the top public institution for biomedical research in funding received from the National Institutes of Health.

Source: Group Health Research Institute
Contact: Rebecca Hughes
.........


ZenMaster

For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at
http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/

Live Imaging Puts New Light on Stem Cell Division

University of Oregon team finds, in fruit flies, that the mitotic spindle does not act alone to divide a cell
Thursday, 02 September 2010

The asymmetrical division of a stem cell — in this case a neuroblast of a fruit fly — is shown, the result of research in the lab of Chris Doe at the University of Oregon. Credit: Courtesy of Clemens Cabernard.
A long-held assumption about asymmetrical division of stem cells has cracked. Researchers at the University of Oregon report that the mitotic spindle does not act alone — that cortical proteins help to position a cleavage furrow in the right location.

Their discovery, described in the Sept. 2 issue of the journal Nature, provides a new window on how stem cells divide to produce two unequal daughter cells: one that lives on as a new stem cell and other, smaller cell, which adopts a new function, in this case as a neuron.

A three-member team focused on drosophila (fruit flies) neural stem cells known as neuroblasts, long known for dividing asymmetrically. What is learned in these flies often applies to many other mitotic (dividing) cells in other organisms such as mammals, including humans.

Clemens Cabernard, a postdoctoral researcher
at the University of Oregon, provided new
insight on the asymmetrical division of
neuroblasts (stem cells) in fruit flies. Credit:
Photo by Jim Barlow.
"This addresses a fundamental question in cell biology, namely how a cell knows where to place a cleavage furrow and thus divide in a symmetrical or asymmetrical fashion," said Clemens Cabernard, a postdoctoral fellow in the lab of Chris Doe, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator in the UO Institute of Molecular Biology and director of the UO Institute of Neuroscience. Also on the team was Kenneth E. Prehoda, a UO biochemist and member of the Institute of Molecular Biology.

What the UO team found is that neuroblasts have two distinct dividing pathways that appear to work redundantly: one that is polarity induced and one that is spindle induced, Cabernard said.

Theories on cleavage furrow positioning during cell division have centred on the mitotic spindle, a network of fibres called microtubules.

One idea is that microtubules from spindle poles reach to the cortex, which delivers a positive or negative signal to determine the position of the cleavage ring. Another idea is that microtubule fibres from the centre of the spindle reach out to the cortex resulting in the assembly of a cleavage ring (a complex consisting of several proteins, one of which is called myosin). A third model involves both. It was thought that asymmetrically dividing cells, such as drosophila neuroblasts, generate an asymmetric spindle and can position the cleavage ring in an asymmetric position, as opposed to symmetrically dividing cells that construct a symmetric spindle.

"We found a new mechanism in which a cleavage furrow can be placed at an asymmetric position," Cabernard said.

"First, by way of a couple of experiments, we ruled out that the cleavage furrow is solely dependent on the position and symmetry/asymmetry of the mitotic spindle."

First researchers used mutants that lack astral microtubules, the microtubule fibres reaching out from the spindle poles towards the cortex and watched with live imaging what happens to the cleavage furrow. A cleavage furrow still occurred in an asymmetric position. This has been seen before but not using the same markers, Cabernard said.

Next, researchers removed the entire spindle from the picture with targeted drugs. Usually cells stop dividing in this condition, but a genetic trick allows these cells to initiate cell division despite the lack of a mitotic spindle. Surprisingly, researchers found, the proteins involved in constructing a cleavage furrow became localized in an asymmetric fashion and positioned a cleavage furrow in an asymmetric position — pretty much like in wild-type neuroblasts.

"Although cell division could not be completed, the dividing point was correctly marked," Cabernard said.

"This told us that there must be a mechanism independent of the spindle."

In a third set of experiments, the research team rotated the mitotic spindle of neuroblasts using genetic mutants and thus changed the position of any spindle-derived signal. Interestingly, the team found that two cleavage furrows now formed, but only one coincided with the new position of the mitotic spindle, strongly supporting the hypothesis that a spindle independent signal also is used. Further experiments revealed that a cortical protein, required for proper neural stem cell divisions in mice and humans, is necessary for the asymmetric positioning of the cleavage furrow.

One of the marker proteins watched closely in the experiments was myosin. When a cell starts the division process, Cabernard said, the spindle is symmetrical but the myosin markers segregated toward the basal side — and is localized in an asymmetric fashion — which becomes smaller and transforms into a neuron upon cell division.

Although this research addresses a basic question in cell biology, the findings have important implications. Asymmetric cell division in fly or human stem cells is important to generate a number of differentiating cells while retaining a stem cell as a back up copy.

Previous work by Cabernard and Doe showed that if drosophila neuroblasts divide in a symmetric manner, which does not normally happen, two neuroblasts are generated. Thus, the researchers said, it is crucial for a stem cell to know where to place a cleavage furrow to produce all the required neurons. Similar results have been observed in neural stem cells in mice.

Source: University of Oregon
Contact: Jim Barlow

Reference:
A spindle-independent cleavage furrow positioning pathway
Clemens Cabernard, Kenneth E. Prehoda & Chris Q. Doe
Nature Vol.: 467, 91–94, (02 September 2010), doi:10.1038/nature09334
.........


ZenMaster

For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at
http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/