Showing posts with label tumour suppressor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tumour suppressor. Show all posts

Friday, 14 November 2014

Tumour Suppressor Also Inhibits Key Property of Stem Cells

Tumour Suppressor Also Inhibits Key Property of Stem Cells
Friday, 14 November 2014

A protein that plays a critical role in preventing the development of many types of human cancers has been shown also to inhibit a vital stem cell property called pluripotency, according to a study by researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine.

Blocking expression of the protein, called retinoblastoma, in mouse cells allowed the researchers to more easily transform them into what are known as induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPS cells. Pluripotent is a term used to describe a cell that is similar to an embryonic stem cell and can become any tissue in the body.

The study provides a direct and unexpected molecular link between cancer and stem cell science through retinoblastoma, or Rb, one of the best known of a class of proteins called tumour suppressors. Although Rb has long been known to control the rate of cell division, the researchers found that it also directly binds and inhibits the expression of genes involved in pluripotency.

"We were very surprised to see that retinoblastoma directly connects control of the cell cycle with pluripotency," said Julien Sage, PhD, associate professor of paediatrics and of genetics.

"This is a completely new idea as to how retinoblastoma functions. It physically prevents the reacquisition of stem cell-ness and pluripotency by inhibiting gene expression."

"The loss of Rb appears to directly change a cell's identity. Without the protein, the cell is much more developmentally fluid and is easier to reprogram into an iPS cell," said Marius Wernig, MD, associate professor of pathology.

Wernig and Sage, both members of the Stanford Cancer Institute, share senior authorship of the study, which will be published online Nov. 13 in Cell Stem Cell. Postdoctoral scholar Michael Kareta, PhD, is the lead author.

Tumour Suppressor
Pluripotent stem cells are able to become any tissue in the body. In 2006, researchers in Shinya Yamanaka's laboratory in Kyoto University found that it's possible to push a fully specialized adult cell, such as a skin cell, backward along the developmental pathway to assume a pluripotent state. They did so by adding four proteins – Sox2, Oct4, c-Myc and Klf4 – that are normally found in cells only very early in embryonic development. The resulting cells were called induced pluripotent stem cells.

Rb was first identified as a tumour suppressor because of its role in a rare but rapidly developing childhood cancer of the retina. It has since been shown to be missing or functionally inactive in nearly all human cancers. Intact Rb prevents cancer by acting as a natural brake on the cell cycle, the process by which cells divide to make daughter cells. Loss of Rb allows a cell to divide more quickly and potentially accumulate more cancer-causing mutations. However, the new research shows that Rb's effect on pluripotency is independent of its role in cell cycle control.

Cancerous cells often appear less mature than their noncancerous peers. They persist in dividing in the face of external cues that curb the proliferation of normal cells, and they often seem to regress developmentally, assuming the form and mimicking the behaviour of their more developmentally flexible ancestors. A similar cascade of events occurs when researchers create iPS cells from specialized adult cells.

"The process of creating iPS cells from fully differentiated, or specialized, cells is in many ways very similar to what happens when a cell becomes cancerous," said Sage, who holds the Harriet and Mary Zelencik Endowed Professorship in Pediatrics.

"We wondered if we could learn more about both processes by investigating whether the loss of Rb affects reprogramming efficiency."

Previous studies in other laboratories have suggested that Rb may also be involved in promoting cellular differentiation – a cell's developmental progression toward a more specialized state.

Link between Rb and Pluripotency
The researchers found that embryonic mouse cells unable to express functional Rb were much more efficiently and quickly converted to iPS cells than were cells in which Rb was present. Conversely, cells with higher-than-normal levels of the Rb protein were more difficult to reprogram into iPS cells. When the researchers compared the rate of division of the control cells with those in which Rb expression was lost, they found no significant differences.

"It didn't change the cell proliferation rates at all," said Wernig.

"This indicated that Rb's mechanism of action on reprogramming was something completely different than what we had expected."

Further investigation showed that Rb directly binds to many genes involved in the acquisition of pluripotency, including those encoding two of the proteins often used by researchers to create iPS cells: Sox2 and Oct4. Loss of Rb increased the expression of the proteins, thereby affecting a large "pluripotency network."

"We saw a global effect on a network of genes involved in pluripotency," said Sage.

The net effect, according to the researchers, is an overall reduction in the natural barrier that exists to prevent specialized adult cells from dedifferentiating – that is, spontaneously becoming pluripotent, an occurrence that could easily wreak havoc on a multicellular organism that depends on an orderly arrangement of tissues.

The researchers also showed that Rb's effect on the pluripotency network is an important driver of cancer in a mouse model. Animals in which Rb expression is blocked typically develop pituitary tumours within a few months. However, the researchers found the cancers didn't occur when Sox2 was also removed.

"It's clear that Sox2 expression is also required for the development of cancers in the animals," said Wernig.

"This implies that Rb's effect on Sox2 expression is critical for cancer development."

The researchers plan to continue their investigations into the relationship between Rb and pluripotency. In particular, Wernig is interested in learning whether Rb expression plays a role in a phenomenon he discovered called direct conversion, in which one cell type, such as a skin cell, can be directly converted into another, such as a neuron, without first entering a pluripotent state.

Contact: Krista Conger

Reference:
Inhibition of Pluripotency Networks by the Rb Tumor Suppressor Restricts Reprogramming and Tumorigenesis
Michael S. Kareta, Laura L. Gorges, Sana Hafeez, Bérénice A. Benayoun, Samuele Marro, Anne-Flore Zmoos, Matthew J. Cecchini, Damek Spacek, Luis F.Z. Batista, Megan O’Brien, Yi-Han Ng, Cheen Euong Ang, Dedeepya Vaka, Steven E. Artandi, Frederick A. Dick, Anne Brunet, Julien Sage, Marius Wernig
Cell Stem Cell, November 13, 2014, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2014.10.019
.........


For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at
http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/

Thursday, 12 September 2013

Stem Cells are wired for Cooperation, Down to the DNA

Study reveals network of genes that safeguard cooperation in stem cells and the developing embryo
Thursday, 12 September 2013

We often think of human cells as tiny computers that perform assigned tasks, where disease is a result of a malfunction. But in the current issue of Science, researchers at The Mount Sinai Medical Center offer a radical view of health — seeing it more as a cooperative state among cells, while they see disease as result of cells at war that fight with each other for domination.

Their unique approach is backed by experimental evidence. The researchers show a network of genes in cells, which includes the powerful tumour suppressor p53, which enforce a cooperative state within cells — rather like the queen bee in a beehive. Disease or disorder occurs when these enforcer genes are mutated, allowing competition between cells to ensue.

"Both competition and cooperation drive evolution, and we are wired for cooperation all the way down to our genes," says the study's senior investigator, Thomas P. Zwaka, MD, PhD, Professor at the Black Family Stem Cell Institute at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

The findings, if backed by future research, offer a new way to address disease, Dr. Zwaka says. Understanding the genetic basis of cooperative and competitive cellular behaviours could explain how cancer and immune system dysfunction develops, he says.

"If a cell has lost a gene that fosters communication among cells, it may dominate other cells by ignoring signals to stop proliferating. It also makes sense that the immune system might detect and attack cells that are not cooperating. Failure to cooperate may also underlie development of birth defects."

He adds that it may be possible to flip the cooperation switch back on therapeutically, or to manipulate stem-like cells to misbehave in a way that produces replacement cells for regenerative medicine.

"Cell misbehave, they are unpredictable. They do not operate like little machines," he says.

"What our study suggests is that cooperation is so central to our evolution that we have genetic mechanisms to protect us against cheating and dominating behaviour."

A network of genes with an ancient function
The research team, which also includes study first author Marion Dejosez, PhD, Assistant Professor at the Icahn School at Mount Sinai, took a long view toward the behaviour of cells. They wondered how it was that cells, which lived on earth as single units for hundreds of millions of years, could effectively bundle themselves together to perform specific tasks.

"Cells started somehow to form alliances, and to cooperate, and obviously this multicellularity had certain advantages."

But they also questioned what happened to the "cheating" behaviour that can be seen in single cells, such as amoeba, that live in colonies — competitive behaviour that allows the cell to gain a reproductive advantage without contributing its fair share to the community.

They conducted a genetic screen in stem cells to look for mutants that allow cells to "misbehave — to become a little antisocial and do things they wouldn't normally do," Dr. Zwaka says.

The screen picked up about 100 genes, which seem to cluster together into a network.

The team focused on three of those genes — p53, long known as the guardian of the genome, Topoisomerase 1 (Top1), which control genomic stability, and olfactory receptors involved in the sensation of smell.

"We could understand that p53 might foster cooperation, because loss of p53 function is a step in the development of many cancers. But finding that top1 and olfactory receptors may have the same function was a surprise," he says.

"We think these genes have the ancient function of safeguarding multicellular organisms by helping cells to coordinate their activities."

The scientists then tested the effects of knocking down these genes in developing mouse embryos. To their surprise, p53 and Top1 knockdown embryos developed normally — perhaps because other intact social enforcement genes took over.

"This showed us that mutant cells only misbehave when they are around normal cells. They become competitive, perhaps promoting an evolutionary advance," Dr. Zwaka says.

"When all the cells are the same, either all mutated or all normal, they cooperate with each other.”

"This study suggests that cell cooperation, altruistic behaviour, cheating, and other so-called social behaviours are wired into cells via the genome at the early primitive stage," he says.

"Perhaps there is no coincidence that amoeba, insects, animals, the human culture and society, generally follow innate rules of cooperation. Darwin's explanation of evolution as a struggle for existence needs to be tempered with an acknowledgment of the importance of cooperation in the evolution of complexity."

Contact: Press Office
.........


For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at
http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/

Monday, 12 August 2013

Tumour Suppressor is needed for Stem Cells to Mature into Neurons

Tumour Suppressor is needed for Stem Cells to Mature into Neurons
Monday, 12 August 2013

CHD5 has previously been proposed as a tumour suppressor, acting as a brake that prevents healthy cells from developing into cancer cells. But the part played by the protein in healthy tissue, and whether this role is important for its ability to counter tumour growth, has remained largely uncharted. Working with colleagues at Trinity College in Dublin and BRIC in Copenhagen, researchers at Karolinska Institute have revealed its function in normal nervous system development and as a tumour suppressor.

The recently published study shows that when stem cells approach the final phase of their specialisation as neurons, CHD5 begins to be expressed at high levels. CHD5 can reshape the chromatin, in which DNA is packed around proteins, and in so doing either facilitate or obstruct the expression of genes. Ulrika Nyman, postdoc researcher in Dr Johan Holmberg's research group and one of the main authors of the current study, explains that on switching off CHD5 in the stem cells of mice embryos during the period in which the brain develops and the majority of neurons are formed, they found was that without CHD5, a stem cell is unable to silence the expression of a number of stem cell genes and genes that are actually to be expressed in muscle, blood or intestinal cells. They also observed an inability in the stem cell to switch on the expression of genes necessary for it to mature into a neuron, leaving it trapped in a stage between stem cell and neuron.

The gene that codes for CHD5 is found on part of chromosome 1 (1p36), which is often lost in tumour cells in a number of cancers, particularly neuroblastoma, a disease that strikes almost only children and which is thought to arise during the development of the peripheral nervous system. Neuroblastoma lacking this section of chromosome and thus also CHD5 are often more aggressive and more rapidly fatal. Treatment with retinoic acid can make immature nerve cells and some neuroblastoma cells mature into specialised nerve cells, but when the researchers prevented neuroblastoma cells from up-regulating CHD5, the tumours no longer responded to retinoic acid treatment.

"In the absence of CHD5, neural tumour cells cannot mature into harmless neurons, but continue to divide, making the tumour more malignant and much harder to treat," says Dr Holmberg at the Department of Cell and Molecular Biology.

"We now hope to be able to restore the ability to up-regulate CHD5 in aggressive tumour cells and make them mature into harmless nerve cells."

Contact: Johan Holmberg

Reference:
CHD5 Is Required for Neurogenesis and Has a Dual Role in Facilitating Gene Expression and Polycomb Gene Repression
Chris M. Egan, Ulrika Nyman, Julie Skotte, Gundula Streubel, Siobhán Turner, David J. O’Connell, Vilma Rraklli, Michael J. Dolan, Naomi Chadderton, Klaus Hansen, Gwyneth Jane Farrar, Kristian Helin, Johan Holmberg, Adrian P. Bracken
Developmental Cell, Volume 26, Issue 3, 223-236, 12 August 2013 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.07.008
.........


For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at