Study Reveals the Genetic Start-up of a Human Embryo

Study Reveals the Genetic Start-up of a Human Embryo

Thursday, 03 September 2015

An international team of scientists led from Sweden’s Karolinska Institutet has for the first time mapped all the genes that are activated in the first few days of a fertilised human egg. The study, which is being published in the journal Nature Communications, provides an in-depth understanding of early embryonic development in human – and scientists now hope that the results will help finding for example new therapies against infertility.

At the start of an individual’s life there is a single fertilised egg cell. One day after fertilisation there are two cells, after two days four, after three days eight and so on, until there are billions of cells at birth. The order in which our genes are activated after fertilisation has remained one of the last uncharted territories of human development.

Juha Kere is a Professor of Molecular Genetics at

Karolinska Institutet. Credit: Ulf Sirborn.

There are approximately 23,000 human genes in total. In the current study, scientists found that only 32 of these genes are switched on two days after fertilization, and by day three there are 129 activated genes. Seven of the genes found and characterised had not been discovered previously.

“These genes are the ‘ignition key’ that is needed to turn on human embryonic development. It is like dropping a stone into water and then watching the waves spread across the surface”, says principal investigator Juha Kere, professor at theDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition at Karolinska Institutet and also affiliated to the SciLifeLab facility in Stockholm.

The researchers had to develop a new way of analysing the results in order to find the new genes. Most genes code for proteins but there are a number of repeated DNA sequences that are often considered to be so-called ‘junk DNA’, but are in fact important in regulating gene expression.

Treatment of infertility

In the current study, the researchers show that the newly identified genes can interact with the ‘junk DNA’, and that this is essential to the start of development.

Outi Hovatta is a Professor of Obstetrics and

Gynaecology at Karolinska Institutet. Credit:

Ulf Sirborn.

“Our results provide novel insights into the regulation of early embryonic development in human. We identified novel factors that might be used in reprogramming cells into so-called pluripotent stem cells for possible treatment of a range of diseases, and potentially also in the treatment of infertility”, says Outi Hovatta, professor at Karolinska Institutet’s Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, and a senior author.

The study was a collaboration between three research groups from Sweden and Switzerland that each provided a unique set of skills and expertise. The work was supported by the Karolinska Institutet Distinguished Professor Award, the Swedish Research Council, the Strategic Research Program for Diabetes funding at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm County, the Jane & Aatos Erkko Foundation, the Instrumentarium Science Foundation, and the Åke Wiberg and Magnus Bergvall foundations. The computations were performed on resources provided by SNIC through Uppsala Multidisciplinary Center for Advanced Computational Science (UPPMAX).

Source: Karolinska Institutet

Contact: KI Press Office

Reference:

Novel PRD-like homeodomain transcription factors and retrotransposon elements in early human development

Virpi Töhönen, Shintaro Katayama, Liselotte Vesterlund, Eeva-Mari Jouhilahti, Mona Sheikhi, Elo Madissoon, Giuditta Filippini-Cattaneo, Marisa Jaconi, Anna Johnsson, Thomas R. Bürglin, Sten Linnarsson, Outi Hovatta and Juha Kere

Nature Communications, 3 September 2015, doi: 10.1038/NCOMMS9207

.........

ZenMaster

---

For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at

http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/

---

Most Complete Human Brain Model to Date Is a ‘Brain Changer’

Once licensed, model likely to accelerate study of Alzheimer’s, autism, more

Wednesday, 19 August 2015

Scientists at The Ohio State University have developed a nearly complete human brain in a dish that equals the brain maturity of a 5-week-old foetus.

The brain organoid, engineered from adult human skin cells, is the most complete human brain model yet developed, said Rene Anand, professor of biological chemistry and pharmacology at Ohio State.

The lab-grown brain, about the size of a pencil eraser, has an identifiable structure and contains 99 percent of the genes present in the human foetal brain. Such a system will enable ethical and more rapid and accurate testing of experimental drugs before the clinical trial stage and advance studies of genetic and environmental causes of central nervous system disorders.

“It not only looks like the developing brain, its diverse cell types express nearly all genes like a brain,” Anand said.

“We’ve struggled for a long time trying to solve complex brain disease problems that cause tremendous pain and suffering. The power of this brain model bodes very well for human health because it gives us better and more relevant options to test and develop therapeutics other than rodents.”

Anand reported on his lab-grown brain Tuesday (Aug. 18) at the 2015 Military Health System Research Symposium in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.

This image of the lab-grown brain is labelled to

show identifiable structures: the cerebral

hemisphere, the optic stalk and the cephalic

flexure, a bend in the mid-brain region, all

characteristic of the human foetal brain. Credit:

courtesy of The Ohio State University.

Anand, who studies the association between nicotinic receptors and central nervous system disorders, was inspired to pursue a model of human neural biology after encountering disappointing results in a rodent study of an experimental autism drug. Taking a chance with a shoestring budget compared to other researchers doing similar projects, he added stem-cell engineering to his research program. Four years later, he had built himself a replica of the human brain.

The main thing missing in this model is a vascular system. What is there – a spinal cord, all major regions of the brain, multiple cell types, signalling circuitry and even a retina – has the potential to dramatically accelerate the pace of neuroscience research, said Anand, also a professor of neuroscience.

“In central nervous system diseases, this will enable studies of either underlying genetic susceptibility or purely environmental influences, or a combination,” he said.

“Genomic science infers there are up to 600 genes that give rise to autism, but we are stuck there. Mathematical correlations and statistical methods are insufficient to in themselves identify causation. You need an experimental system – you need a human brain.”

Converting adult skin cells into pluripotent cells – immature stem cells that can be programmed to become any tissue in the body – is a rapidly developing area of science that earned the researcher who discovered the technique, Shinya Yamanaka, a Nobel Prize in 2012.

“Once a cell is in that pluripotent state, it can become any organ – if you know what to do to support it to become that organ,” Anand said.

“The brain has been the holy grail because of its enormous complexity compared to any other organ. Other groups are attempting to do this as well.”

Anand’s method is proprietary and he has filed an invention disclosure with the university.

He said he used techniques to differentiate pluripotent stem cells into cells that are designed to become neural tissue, components of the central nervous system or other brain regions.

“We provide the best possible environment and conditions that replicate what’s going on in utero to support the brain,” he said of the work he completed with colleague Susan McKay, a research associate in biological chemistry and pharmacology.

High-resolution imaging of the organoid identifies functioning neurons and their signal-carrying extensions – axons and dendrites – as well as astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and microglia. The model also activates markers for cells that have the classic excitatory and inhibitory functions in the brain, and that enable chemical signals to travel throughout the structure.

It takes about 15 weeks to build a model system developed to match the 5-week-old foetal human brain. Anand and McKay have let the model continue to grow to the 12-week point, observing expected maturation changes along the way.

“If we let it go to 16 or 20 weeks, that might complete it, filling in that 1 percent of missing genes. We don’t know yet,” he said.

He and McKay have already used the platform to launch their own projects, creating brain organoid models of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases and autism in a dish. They hope that with further development and the addition of a pumping blood supply, the model could be used for stroke therapy studies. For military purposes, the system offers a new platform for the study of Gulf War illness, traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Anand hopes his brain model could be incorporated into the Microphysiological Systems program, a platform the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is developing by using engineered human tissue to mimic human physiological systems.

Support for the work came from the Marci and Bill Ingram Research Fund for Autism Spectrum Disorders and the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Research Fund.

Anand and McKay are co-founders of a Columbus-based start-up company, NeurXstem, to commercialize the brain organoid platform, and have applied for funding from the federal Small Business Technology Transfer program to accelerate its drug discovery applications.

Source: Ohio State University

Contact: Rene Anand

.........

ZenMaster

---

For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at

http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/

---

From Pluripotency to Totipotency

Scientists discover mechanism that may lead to more efficient reprogramming of somatic cells

Wednesday, 05 August 2015

Human embryonic stem cells have the potential

to form in vitro neural tube-like structures of the

embryo. Credit: Inserm/Benchoua Alexandra.

While it is already possible to obtain in vitro pluripotent cells (i.e., cells capable of generating all tissues of an embryo) from any cell type, researchers from Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla's team from Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, have pushed the limits of science even further. They managed to obtain totipotent cells with the same characteristics as those of the earliest embryonic stages and with even more interesting properties. Obtained in collaboration with Juanma Vaquerizas from the Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine (Münster, Germany), these results are published on 3rd of August in the journal Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

Totipotency vs pluripotency

Just after fertilization, when the embryo is comprised of only 1 or 2 cells, cells are "totipotent", that is to say, capable of producing an entire embryo as well as the placenta and umbilical cord that accompany it. During the subsequent rounds of cell division, cells rapidly lose this plasticity and become "pluripotent". At the blastocyst stage (about thirty cells), the so-called "embryonic stem cells" can differentiate into any tissue, although they alone cannot give birth to a foetus anymore. Pluripotent cells then continue to specialise and form the various tissues of the body through a process called cellular differentiation.

For some years, it has been possible to re-programme differentiated cells into pluripotent ones, but not into totipotent cells. Now, the team of Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla has studied the characteristics of totipotent cells of the embryo and found factors capable of inducing a totipotent-like state.

“Totipotency is a much more flexible state than the pluripotent state and its potential applications are extraordinary”, says Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla, who led the study.

Looking for the keys of totipotency

When culturing pluripotent stem cells in vitro, a small amount of totipotent cells appear spontaneously; these are called "2C-like cells" (named after their resemblance to the 2-cell stage embryo). The researchers compared these cells to those present in early embryos in order to find their common characteristics and those that make them different from pluripotent cells. In particular, the teams found that the DNA was less condensed in totipotent cells and that the amount of the protein complex CAF1 was diminished. A closer look revealed that CAF1 – already known for its role in the assembly of chromatin (the organised state of DNA) – is responsible for maintaining the pluripotent state by ensuring that the DNA is wrapped around histones. Based on this hypothesis, the Torres-Padilla team was able to induce a totipotent state by inactivating the expression of the CAF1 complex, which led to chromatin reprogramming into a less condensed state.

A 2C-like cell (green) is different from an

embryonic stem cell (magenta). Credit:

IGBMC/Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla.

In order to carefully examine at a molecular level the similarities between 2-cell stage embryos, 2C-like cells and those induced by inactivating the CAF1 complex, the Torres-Padilla team then joined forces with the Vaquerizas laboratory to analyse, in a genome-wide fashion, the gene expression programmes of these cells. The scientists found that the induced, CAF1-depleted, totipotent cells overexpressed a significant amount of 2-cell stage embryo genes.

“One could imagine that if cells lose their ability to assemble chromatin, this would affect gene expression”, explains Cells-in-Motion PhD student Rocio Enriquez-Gasca of Juanma Vaquerizas’ lab, who performed the computational analyses of the work.

“So it was really exciting to realise that the resulting gene expression programme in fact significantly overlaps with that of early embryo, totipotent cells”.

Moreover, the teams found that specific classes of repetitive elements (repeated sequences of DNA that form around 50% of the mouse and human genomes) were also up-regulated in induced totipotent-like cells, a hallmark of the 2-cell embryo.

“The computational analysis of expression of repetitive elements is very challenging, since these are found many times in the genome”, says Juanma Vaquerizas.

“Now it is key to understand why these repetitive elements and gene expression programmes are both up-regulated in totipotent cells”.

These results provide new elements for the understanding of pluripotency and could increase the efficiency of reprogramming somatic cells to be used for applications in regenerative medicine.

Source: INSERM

Contact: Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla 

Reference:

Early embryonic-like cells are induced by down-regulation of replication-dependent chromatin assembly

Takashi Ishiuchi, Rocio Enriquez-Gasca, Eiji Mizutani, Ana Boškovi, Celine Ziegler-Birling, Diego Rodriguez-Terrones, Teruhiko Wakayama, Juan M. Vaquerizas & Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla

Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 3 Aug 2015, doi:10.1038/nsmb.3066

.........

ZenMaster

---

For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at

http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/

---

Genome's Tale of 'Conquer and Enslave'

Genome's Tale of 'Conquer and Enslave'

Saturday, 21 February 2015

Toronto scientists uncovered how viral remnants helped shape control of our genes.

If genes were lights on a string of DNA, the genome would appear as an endless flicker, as thousands of genes come on and off at any given time. Tim Hughes, a Professor at the University of Toronto's Donnelly Centre, is set on figuring out the rules behind this tightly orchestrated light-show, because when it fails, disease can occur.

This is Professor Tim Hughes of University of

Toronto's Donnelly Centre for Cellular and

Biomolecular Research. Credit: University of

Toronto.

Genes are switched on or off by proteins called transcription factors. These proteins bind to precise sites on the DNA that serve as guideposts, telling transcription factors that their target genes are nearby.

In their latest paper, published in Nature Biotechnology, Hughes and his team did the first systematic study of the largest group of human transcription factors, called C2H2-ZF.

Despite their important roles in development and disease, these proteins have been largely unexplored because they posed a formidable challenge for researchers.

C2H2-ZF transcription factors count over 700 proteins - around three per cent of all human genes! To make matters more complicated, most human C2H2-ZF proteins are very different from those in other organisms, like those in mice. This means that scientists could not apply insights gained from animal studies to human C2H2-ZFs.

Hughes' team found something remarkable: the reason C2H2-ZFs are so abundant and diverse - which makes them difficult to study - is that many of them evolved to defend our ancestral genome from damage caused by the notorious "selfish DNA."

Selfish DNA are bits of parasitic DNA whose only purpose is to multiply, a kind of virus for our genome. They seize a cell's resources to make copies of themselves, which they insert randomly across the genome - causing harmful mutations along the way.

Almost half the human genome is made of selfish DNA, which probably came from ancient retro-viruses which, similar to modern counterparts, inserted their DNA into the host's genome. When this happens in an egg or sperm, the viral DNA gets passed on to the next generation, and the selfish DNA is then known as endogenous retro-elements (EREs).

Evolutionary biologists believe that selfish DNA was instrumental in making genomes bigger, giving natural selection additional DNA material to tinker with.

But Hughes' data suggest that EREs took centre stage in an evolutionary arms race, and that this change spawned C2H2-ZFs, a new group of proteins.

It is an enthralling tale of "conquer and enslave," one that stretches from before mammals existed to the present day.

Hughes says that C2H2-ZFs initially evolved to switch off EREs. As new EREs invaded the genome of our lizard-like ancestor, new C2H2-ZFs arose to prevent them from disrupting gene function.

This would explain how the C2H2-ZF came to be so abundant but also why they are so diverse among different organisms.

"What I think was not appreciated until this study is that retro-elements are really a driving force in the evolution of transcription factors themselves. All mammals have a whole bunch of custom transcription factors that came about to silence the EREs," says Hughes, who is also a Professor in U of T's Department of Molecular Genetics and a Senior Fellow of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research.

"But the EREs and these new transcription factors are different even for different vertebrates."

These EREs are now harmless because they are millions of years old. Over time they accumulated mutations, which pepper the genome at a constant rate, and, as a result, lost their ability to multiply and move around.

The C2H2-ZFs, on the other hand, took on new jobs.

C2H2-ZF proteins began using the EREs scattered across the genome as DNA docking sites, from which they could take control of nearby genes. The conquered EREs were finally enslaved.

Hughes describes a neat example of this process. One C2H2-ZF family member, a transcription factor called ZNF189 evolved to silence an ancient retro-element, known as LINE L2, which is a staggering 100 million years old. L2 is now inactive but ZNF189 still binds to it because it uses L2 remnants to reach other genes.

Relics of L2 sequences happen to be near genes that drive brain and heart development. And so ZNF189 could take on a new role in shaping these organs, an arrangement preserved by natural selection because it was beneficial to the embryo.

ZFN189 likely puts "breaks" on the "brain genes", similar to its ancient role with L2. But in heart cells, it may actually turn genes on because it misses the part that makes the "off switch."

This story is a beautiful example of just how malleable genomes are at the hands of evolution.

Source: University of Toronto

Contact: Jovana Drinjakovic

Reference:

C2H2 zinc finger proteins greatly expand the human regulatory lexicon

Najafabadi HS, Mnaimneh S, Schmitges FW, Garton M, Lam KN, Yang A, Albu M, Weirauch MT, Radovani E, Kim PM, Greenblatt J, Frey BJ, Hughes TR

Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Feb 18; doi:10.1038/nbt.3128

.........

ZenMaster

---

For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at

http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/

---

NIH-Supported Researchers Map Epigenome of More Than 100 Tissue and Cell Types

NIH-Supported Researchers Map Epigenome of More Than 100 Tissue and Cell Types

Thursday, 19 February 2015

Much like mapping the human genome laid the foundations for understanding the genetic basis of human health, new maps of the human epigenome may further unravel the complex links between DNA and disease. The epigenome is part of the machinery that helps direct how genes are turned off and on in different types of cells.

Researchers supported by the National Institutes of Health Common Fund's Roadmap Epigenomics Program have mapped the epigenomes of more than 100 types of cells and tissues, providing new insight into which parts of the genome are used to make a particular type of cell. The data, available to the biomedical research community, can be found at the National Center for Biotechnology Information website.

Reference epigenomes are available for more than 100 cell and tissue types.
Credit: Image courtesy of Nature and Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium. 

"This represents a major advance in the ongoing effort to understand how the 3 billion letters of an individual's DNA instruction book are able to instruct vastly different molecular activities, depending on the cellular context," said NIH Director Francis Collins, M.D., Ph.D.

"This outpouring of data-rich publications, produced by a remarkable team of creative scientists, provides powerful momentum for the rapidly growing field of epigenomics."

Researchers from the NIH Common Fund's Roadmap Epigenomics Program published a description of the epigenome maps in the journal Nature. More than 20 additional papers, published in Nature and Nature-associated journals, show how these maps can be used to study human biology.

"What the Roadmap Epigenomics Program has delivered is a way to look at the human genome in its living, breathing nature from cell type to cell type," said Manolis Kellis, Ph.D., professor of computer science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, and senior author of the paper.

Understanding epigenomics

Almost all human cells have identical genomes that contain instructions on how to make the many different cells and tissues in the body. During the development of different types of cells, regulatory proteins turn genes on and off and, in doing so, establish a layer of chemical signatures that make up the epigenome of each cell. In the Roadmap Epigenomics Program, researchers compared these epigenomic signatures and established their differences across a variety of cell types. The resulting information can help us understand how changes to the genome and epigenome can lead to conditions such as Alzheimer's disease, cancer, asthma, and foetal growth abnormalities.

An epigenomic signature can be made on the

genome in two ways, both of which play a role in

turning genes off or on. The first occurs when

chemical tags called methyl groups are attached

to a DNA molecule directly (DNA methylation).

The second occurs when a variety of chemical

tags attach to the tails of histone proteins that

package DNA (histone modifications). Credit:

Image courtesy of John Stamatoyannopoulos

and Rae Senarighi. 

The value of epigenomic data

Researchers can now take data from different cell types and directly compare them.

"Today, sequencing the human genome can be done rapidly and cheaply, but interpreting the genome remains a challenge," said Bing Ren, Ph.D., professor of cellular and molecular medicine at the University of California, San Diego, and co-author of the Nature paper and several of the associated papers.

"These 111 reference epigenome maps are essentially a vocabulary book that helps us decipher each DNA segment in distinct cell and tissue types. These maps are like snapshots of the human genome in action."

"This is the most comprehensive catalogue of epigenomic data from primary human cells and tissues to date," said Lisa Helbling Chadwick, Ph.D., project team leader and a program director at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), part of NIH.

"This coordinated effort, along with uniform data processing, makes it much easier for researchers to make direct comparisons across the entire data set."

"Researchers from the 88 projects supported by the program, including those from this recent series of papers, have propelled the development of new epigenomic technologies," said John Satterlee, Ph.D., co-coordinator of the Roadmap Epigenomics Program, and program director at the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), part of NIH. Satterlee added that the work of this program has served as a foundation for continued exploration of the human epigenome through the International Human Epigenome Consortium.

"With this increased understanding of the full epigenome, and the datasets available to the entire scientific community, the NIH Common Fund is striving to catalyse future research, to aid the understanding of how epigenomics plays a role in human diseases, with the expectation that further studies will identify early indications of disease and targets for therapeutics," said James Anderson, M.D., Ph.D., director of NIH Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives that oversees the NIH Common Fund.

NIDA, NIEHS, and the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders are co-administrators of the NIH Common Fund's Epigenomics Program.

Source: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

Contact: Robin Mackar

Reference:

Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes

Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium

Nature, (2015); doi: 10.1038/nature14248

.........

ZenMaster

---

For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at

http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/

---

Why is a Dolphin Not a Cat?

How repurposing non-coding elements in the genome gave rise to the great 'mammalian radiation'

Friday, 30 January 2015

Exploring gene regulation in 20 mammals

provides insights into the mammalian radiation

that occurred over 100 million years ago. Credit:

Spencer Phillips, EMBL-EBI.

New research shows how evolution has given rise to a rich diversity of species by repurposing functional elements shared by all mammals. Published in Cell by scientists at the European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) and the University of Cambridge Cancer Research UK-Cambridge Institute (CRUK CI), the study demonstrates how methods for understanding human biology can be used to understand a broad range of species.

Mammals all share a common ancestor, and they share a lot of the same genes. So what exactly makes a dolphin not a cat, and how did we all start to diverge from one another millions of years ago? Part of the answer lies in how - and when - genes are regulated. This latest research explores the evolution of gene regulation in 20 mammalian species, and provides deep insights into the 'mammalian radiation', a time of rapid morphological evolution that occurred shortly after the asteroid impact that caused the extinction of the dinosaurs.

Leveraging findings from a study comparing the genome sequences of 29 mammals, and with the help of conservation organisations such as the UK Cetacean Strandings Investigation Programme and the Copenhagen Zoo, the team were able to study and compare gene regulation in liver cells from 20 key species including the naked mole rat, human, Tasmanian devil, dolphin and Sei whale.

"What we've shown is that evolution repurposes things that exist in all species, to make each species unique," explains Paul Flicek, head of Vertebrate Genomics at EMBL-EBI.

"By looking at gene promoters and enhancers in many different mammals, we demonstrated that species-specific enhancers come from ancient DNA - that evolution captures DNA that's been around for a long time, and uses it for gene regulation in specific tissues."

Evolution has two ways to turn changes in the genome into differences between species: it can change a protein sequence, or it can change the way promoters or enhancers control that protein's expression. Today's study also shows that in some cases evolution uses both strategies at once. When amino acid sequences evolve very quickly, important regulation changes occur at the same time: the protein-coding sequence and the corresponding regulatory sequence change synergistically.

Gathering the samples - the experimental efforts were led by Diego Villar of CRUK CI - took well over two years, and the experiments themselves produced a staggering volume of data. Analysing the results brought the team to a new frontier in bioinformatics.

"People spend a lot of time and money trying to understand human biology, so most of the tools we have are designed to study human genomes," explains Camille Berthelot of EMBL-EBI, who led the computational work.

"The reference data we have for the less studied species, like the Sei whale or Tasmanian devil, are nothing like the pored-over datasets we have for the human genome. A lot of what we did involved benchmarking, and making sure the methods and algorithms were fit for this kind of comparison."

"What inspired this work was a desire to get on top of the mountain, look out and see what is going on in the landscape of molecular evolution across the breadth of mammalian space," says Duncan Odom of CRUK CI and Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.

"What's exciting about this study is that we now know we can start to answer questions about the functional genetics of many under-explored species - questions we usually can ask only of humans and mice. We can use tools developed to study humans to understand the biology of all kinds of animals, whether they're blackbirds or elephants, and explore their relationship with one another. This research has given us new insights into mammalian evolution, and proven how powerful these methods can be."

Source: EMBL

Contact: Mary Todd Bergman

Reference:

Enhancer Evolution across 20 Mammalian Species

Diego Villar, Camille Berthelot, Sarah Aldridge, Tim F. Rayner, Margus Lukk, Miguel Pignatelli, Thomas J. Park, Robert Deaville, Jonathan T. Erichsen, Anna J. Jasinska, James M.A. Turner, Mads F. Bertelsen, Elizabeth P. Murchison, Paul Flicek, Duncan T. Odom

Cell, Volume 160, Issue 3, p554–566, 29 January 2015, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.006

.........

ZenMaster

---

For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at

http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/

---

Scientists find that SCNT Derived Cells and iPS Cells are Similar

Scientists find that SCNT Derived Cells and iPS Cells are Similar

Thursday, 06 November 2014

A team led by New York Stem Cell Foundation (NYSCF) Research Institute scientists conducted a study comparing induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells and embryonic stem cells created using somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). The scientists found that the cells derived from these two methods resulted in cells with highly similar gene expression and DNA methylation patterns. Both methods also resulted in stem cells with similar amounts of DNA mutations, showing that the process of turning an adult cell into a stem cell introduces mutations independent of the specific method used. This suggests that both methods of producing stem cells need to be further investigated before determining their suitability for the development of new therapies for chronic diseases.

The NYSCF Research Institute is one of the only laboratories in the world that currently pursues all forms of stem cell research including SCNT and iPS cell techniques for creating stem cells. The lack of laboratories attempting SCNT research was one of the reasons that the NYSCF Research Institute was established in 2006.

"We do not yet know which technique will allow scientists to create the best cells for new cellular therapies," said Susan L. Solomon, NYSCF CEO and co-founder.

"It is critical to pursue both SCNT and iPS cell techniques in order to accelerate research and bring new treatments to patients."

While both techniques result in pluripotent stem cells, or cells that can become any type of cell in the body, the two processes are different. SCNT consists of replacing the nucleus of a human egg cell or oocyte with the nucleus of an adult cell, resulting in human embryonic stem cells with the genetic material of the adult cell. In contrast, scientists create iPS cells by expressing a few key genes in adult cells, like a skin or blood cell, causing the cells to revert to an embryonic-like state. These differences in methods could, in principle, result in cells with different properties. Advances made earlier this year by NYSCF Research Institute scientists that showed that human embryonic stem cells could be derived using SCNT revived that debate.

"Our work shows that we now have two methods for the generation of a patient's personal stem cells, both with great potential for the development of treatments of chronic diseases. Our work will also be welcome news for the many scientists performing basic research on iPS cells. It shows that they are likely working with cells that are very similar to human embryonic stem cells, at least with regard to gene expression and DNA methylation. How the finding of mutations might affect clinical use of stem cells generated from adult cells is the subject of an ongoing debate," said Dr. Dieter Egli, NYSCF Senior Research Fellow, NYSCF - Robertson Investigator, Assistant Professor in Pediatrics & Molecular Genetics at Columbia University, and senior author on the paper.

The study, published today in Cell Stem Cell, compared cell lines derived from the same sources using the two differing techniques, specifically contrasting the frequency of genetic coding mutations seen and measuring how closely the stem cells matched the embryonic state through the analysis of DNA methylation and of gene expression patterns. The scientists showed that both methods resulted in cell types that were similar with regard to gene expression and DNA methylation patterns. This suggested that both methods were effective in turning a differentiated cell into a stem cell.

The scientists also showed that cells derived using both SCNT and iPS techniques showed similar numbers of genetic coding mutations, implying that neither technique is superior in that regard. A similar number of changes in DNA methylation at imprinted genes (genes that are methylated differentially at the maternal versus the paternal allele) were also found. It is important to note that both types of techniques led to cells that had more of these aberrations than embryonic stem cells derived from an unfertilized human oocyte, or than embryonic stem cells derived from leftover IVF embryos. These findings suggest that a small number of defects are inherent to the generation of stem cells from adult differentiated cells and occur regardless of the method used.

Source: New York Stem Cell Foundation

Contact: David McKeon

Reference:

Comparable Frequencies of Coding Mutations and Loss of Imprinting in Human Pluripotent Cells Derived by Nuclear Transfer and Defined Factors

Bjarki Johannesson, Ido Sagi, Athurva Gore, Daniel Paull, Mitsutoshi Yamada, Tamar Golan-Lev, Zhe Li, Charles LeDuc, Yufeng Shen, Samantha Stern, Nanfang Xu, Hong Ma, Eunju Kang, Shoukhrat Mitalipov, Mark V. Sauer, Kun Zhang, Nissim Benvenisty, Dieter Egli

Cell Stem Cell, Volume 15, Issue 5, p634–642, 6 November 2014, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2014.10.002

.........

ZenMaster

---

For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at

http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/

---

Some Stem Cell Methods Closer to "Gold Standard" than Others

Nuclear transfer appears superior for creating embryonic stem cells

Thursday, 03 July 2014

Researchers around the world have turned to stem cells, which have the potential to develop into any cell type in the body, for potential regenerative and disease therapeutics.

Now, for the first time, researchers at the Salk Institute, with collaborators from Oregon Health & Science University and the University of California, San Diego, have shown that stem cells created using two different methods are far from identical. The finding could lead to improved avenues for developing stem cell therapies as well as a better understanding of the basic biology of stem cells.

The researchers discovered that stem cells created by moving genetic material from a skin cell into an empty egg cell — rather than coaxing adult cells back to their embryonic state by artificially turning on a small number of genes — more closely resemble human embryonic stem cells, which are considered the gold standard in the field.

Joseph R. Ecker, Professor, Genomic Analysis

Laboratory. Credit: Courtesy of the Salk

Institute for Biological Studies. 

"These cells created using eggs' cytoplasm have fewer reprogramming issues, fewer alterations in gene expression levels and are closer to real embryonic stem cells," says co-senior author Joseph R. Ecker, professor and director of Salk's Genomic Analysis Laboratory and co-director of the Center of Excellence for Stem Cell Genomics. The results of the study were published today in Nature.

Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) are directly pulled from unused embryos discarded from in-vitro fertilization, but ethical and logistical quandaries have restricted their access. In the United States, federal funds have limited the use of hESCs so researchers have turned to other methods to create stem cells. Most commonly, scientists create induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells by starting with adult cells (often from the skin) and adding a mixture of genes that, when expressed, regress the cells to a pluripotent stem-cell state. Researchers can then coax the new stem cells to develop into cells that resemble those in the brain or in the heart, giving scientists a valuable model for studying human disease in the lab.

Over the past year, a team at OHSU built upon a technique called somatic cell nuclear transfer (the same that is used for cloning an organism, such as Dolly the sheep) to transplant the DNA-containing nucleus of a skin cell into an empty human egg, which then naturally matures into a group of stem cells.

Shoukhrat Mitalipov, Ph.D., Oregon Health &

Science University, led a team that found that a

process called "somatic cell nuclear transfer" is

much better and more accurate at

reprogramming human skin cells to become

embryonic stem cells. Credit: Oregon Health &

Science University.

Ecker, holder of the Salk International Council Chair in Genetics, teamed up with Shoukhrat Mitalipov, developer of the new technique and director of the Center for Embryonic Cell and Gene Therapy at OHSU, and UCSD assistant professor Louise Laurent to carry out the first direct comparison of the two approaches. The scientists created four lines of nuclear transfer stem cells all using eggs from a single donor, along with seven lines of iPS cells and two lines of the gold standard hESCs. All cell lines were shown to be able to develop into multiple cell types and had nearly identical DNA content contained within them.

But when they looked closer at the cells, the researchers spotted some differences: the patterns of methylation — chemical flags that are added to genes to control their expression — varied between the cell lines. This indicates a difference in how and when genes, despite having identical sequences, might be expressed. The methylation of nuclear transfer cells more closely resembled hESCs than the iPS cells did. And when the investigators looked at patterns of actual gene expression — by measuring the levels of particular RNA strands produced by each cell — the differences continued. Once again, nuclear transfer cells had RNA levels closer to embryonic cells, making them more accurate for basic research and therapeutic studies.

"Both the DNA methylation and gene expression data show that nuclear transfer does a better job at erasing the signature of the original skin cell," says Laurent, who is a co-senior author of the paper.

"If you believe that gene expression is important, which we do, then the closer you get to the gene expression patterns of embryonic stem cells, the better," Ecker says.

"Right now, nuclear transfer cells look closer to the embryonic stem cells than do the iPS cells."

Ecker doesn't expect labs to race to make the switch to nuclear transfer protocols — after all, the method falls within those restricted for federal funding. But he thinks the new observation likely holds lessons that could help improve the protocols for making iPS cells.

"What this is telling us is that you can use the standard mix of genes and they do a pretty good job of creating iPS cells," Ecker says.

"But they're not perfect. The material in an egg does a better job than just those four genes alone."

If researchers can pin down what it is within an egg that drives the production of pluripotent stem cells, they may be able to integrate that knowledge into iPS methods to improve stem cell therapy for disease.

"At this point, nuclear transfer stem cells combine the key advantages of both hESCs and iPS cells and, as such, are ideal for clinical applications in regenerative therapy," adds Mitalipov.

Other researchers on the study were Ryan C. O'Neil, Yupeng He, Matthew D. Schultz, Manoj Heriharan, Joseph R. Nery, and Rosa Castanon of the Salk Institute for Biological Studies; Hong Ma, Brittany Daughtry, Masahito Tachibana, Eunju Kang, Rebecca Tippner-Hedges, Riffat Ahmed, Nuria Marti Gutierrez, Crystal Van Dyken, Alimujiang Fulati, Atsushi Sugawara, Michelle Sparman, Paula Amato and Don P. Wolf of Oregon Health & Science University; Robert Morey, Karen Sabatini and Rathi D. Thiagarajan of the University of California, San Diego; and Sumita Gokhale of the Boston University School of Medicine.

Source: Salk Institute for Biological Studies

Contact: Kristina Grifantini

Reference:

Abnormalities in human pluripotent cells due to reprogramming mechanisms

Hong Ma, Robert Morey, Ryan C. O'Neil, Yupeng He, Brittany Daughtry, Matthew D. Schultz, Manoj Hariharan, Joseph R. Nery, Rosa Castanon, Karen Sabatini, Rathi D. Thiagarajan, Masahito Tachibana, Eunju Kang, Rebecca Tippner-Hedges, Riffat Ahmed, Nuria Marti Gutierrez, Crystal Van Dyken, Alim Polat, Atsushi Sugawara, Michelle Sparman, Sumita Gokhale, Paula Amato, Don P.Wolf, Joseph R. Ecker, Louise C. Laurent & Shoukhrat Mitalipov

Nature (2014), doi:10.1038/nature13551

.........

ZenMaster

---

For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at

http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/

---