![]() |
| Human egg cell. |
Tuesday, 21 October 2014
Shopping for an Egg Donor
Posted by ZenMaster at Tuesday, October 21, 2014
Labels: donation, egg, embryo, ethics, human, IVF, oocyte, US 0 comments
Thursday, 17 October 2013
Increase Seen in Donor Eggs for In Vitro Fertilization
![]() |
| Human egg at ovulation. |
Tuesday, 3 May 2011
Researchers in Brazil Establish the First Line of Human Embryonic Stem Cells
Researchers in Brazil Establish the First Line of Human Embryonic Stem Cells
Tuesday, 03 May 2011
Brazilian researchers, reporting in the current issue of Cell Transplantation, discovered difficulties in establishing a genetically diverse line of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) to serve the therapeutic stem cell transplantation needs of the diverse ethnic and genetic Brazilian population.
According to the study's corresponding author, Dr. Lygia V. Pereira of the Molecular Genetics Laboratory at the University of Sao Paulo, Brazil, pluripotent human embryonic stem cells are an important tool for basic and applied stem cell transplantation research. However, immunocompatibility is an issue, especially in a genetically diverse population such as that in Brazil where the population is comprised of European, African and Native South American ancestry.
In their study, the researchers developed an hES cell line (the first in South America) they called "BR-1" derived from a Brazilian population with embryos donated by couples who had sought assistance from private fertility clinics. Their research was compatible with the 2005 Brazilian national legal, ethical and clinical guidelines for embryonic stem cell research using tissue that had been frozen for the legally mandated time of at least three years, and that had been produced for reproductive reasons.
Their results showed that the hES cell lines they established were a "worse match" to the Brazilian population than hESC lines developed elsewhere, particularly those developed in the U.S. and Singapore.
The reasons for that may be several, said Dr. Pereira.
"The Brazilian population is one of the most heterogeneous in the world, and the genes of Brazilians are mosaics," said Dr. Pereira.
"However, an analysis of BR-1 showed that it is mostly European in origin. The reproductive assistance offered by the Brazilian public health system does not include cryopreservation of surplus embryos, meaning that the only research material available came from private clinics where couples with above-average incomes could afford the high cost of assisted reproduction."
According to the researchers, that segment of the Brazilian population is mostly composed of people self-identified as white - of European ancestry - and so is not representative of Brazilian ethnic admixture and, thus, is unable to be widely compatible with Brazil's diverse population genetics.
"Although we have successfully established the first line of hESCs from the Brazilian population that adds to the pool of genetically different pluripotent cells available, it will be important to have access to embryos from the more mixed population and assistance from the Public Health System," concluded Dr. Pereira.
"Use of embryonic stem cells (ES) in regenerative medicine is very promising, but the potential problems of tumour development, cell rejection due to histo-incompatibility, and contamination with animal products employed in the cell culture need to be overcome," said Dr. Julio Voltarelli, professor of Clinical Medicine and Clinical Immunology at the University of Sao PĆ£ulo, Brazil and section editor for Cell Transplantation.
"In this study, Dr Pereira and colleagues compared the HLA compatibility between their ESC line, the first established in Brazil, and a sample of the Brazilian population who volunteered as donors for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (REDOME). They found few matches for the ESC line in the representative population, which was attributed to the great genetic heterogeneity of the Brazilian population. This finding may add another difficulty to the clinical use of ESC in Brazil and other mixed populations even once the safety issues of ESC lines are resolved."
Source: Florida Science Communications
Contact: Randolph Fillmore
Reference:
Establishment Of A Brazilian Line Of Human Embryonic Stem Cells In Defined Medium – Implications For Cell Therapy In An Ethnically Diverse Population
Fraga, A. M.; Sukoyan, M.; Rajan, P.; Braga, D. P. F.; Iaconelli, A., Jr.; Franco, J. G., Jr.; Borges, E., Jr.; Pereira, L. V.
Cell Transplant. 20(3):431-440; 2011.
.........
ZenMaster
For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at
http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/
Posted by ZenMaster at Tuesday, May 03, 2011
Labels: donation, embryonic, ethics, hESCs, human, research, stem cells 0 comments
Thursday, 2 September 2010
People Want to be Asked before Sharing Genetic Data
Group Health study is first to ask patients about sharing their data
Thursday, 02 September 2010
People want to be informed and asked for consent before deciding whether to let researchers share their genetic information in a federal database. This is according to a team of investigators at Group Health Research Institute and the University of Washington (UW). The team's report, called "Glad You Asked," is in the September 2010 Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics.
To the team's knowledge, it is the first to ask research participants' opinions about the need for informed consent for sharing their own information. The team explored participants' preferences while collaborating on the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network. The Network involves volunteers enrolled in the joint Group Health-UW Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) study. ACT is a longitudinal cohort study that tracks aging-related changes in thousands of older Group Health patients over time.
When the team asked Group Health patients who participate in ACT whether their "de-identified" (anonymous) genetic and medical record information could be shared in the database, 86 percent said yes. Then the team surveyed 365 ACT study participants who had agreed to let their genetic information be shared, mostly because of a "desire to help others." In the survey, 90 percent of participants said they thought it was important to have been asked for this reconsent.
Reconsent means getting additional informed consent from research participants before using their information for a purpose beyond what they agreed to originally. Alternatives to reconsent — including opting out, being notified, or neither individual permission nor notification — were unacceptable to 40 percent, 67 percent, and 70 percent of the surveyed participants, respectively.
![]() |
Evette J. Ludman, Ph.D.. Credit: Group Health Research Institute. |
"This indicates that even if most of a study's participants would agree to data sharing, it's still crucial to ask them."
Since 2008, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has strongly encouraged many studies to submit genetic information to the federal database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP). The reason is that genomic research on large numbers of people can yield insights that are not possible with smaller numbers.
For new studies that will enrol participants prospectively, informed consent can — and should — address such sharing. But sharing genetic data raises ethical questions for longitudinal cohort studies, including ACT, which started long before dbGaP was established in 2006. Few existing informed consents address data sharing through this new mechanism. Ideally, Dr. Ludman suggested, research grants would include funding and time to pursue reconsent. In this study, it cost around $50 for each participant who was asked.
"Trust is a two-way street, and human research requires lots of trust," Dr. Ludman said.
"People have an understandable feeling of ownership over their bodies and medical records, including their genetic information," she added.
"Researchers show we're worthy of trust when we ask research participants for permission to use their information in a way that they haven't already agreed to."
Recent high-profile legal cases have highlighted the issue of consent and trust in research, including the Havasupai tribe vs. Arizona State University and parents vs. the Texas health department over storing newborn blood samples without parental consent. So too has the bestselling book, “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks”, about the history surrounding the HeLa cell line, the world's most widely grown human cells.
About:
The eMERGE Network:
The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network is a national consortium formed to develop, disseminate, and apply approaches to research that combine DNA biorepositories with electronic medical record (EMR) systems for large-scale, high-throughput genetic research. The Network brings together researchers with a wide range of expertise in genomics, statistics, ethics, informatics, and clinical medicine from leading medical research institutions across the country: Group Health Cooperative with the UW; Marshfield Clinic; Mayo Clinic; Northwestern University; and Vanderbilt University.
Group Health Research Institute:
Founded in 1947, Group Health Cooperative is a Seattle-based, consumer-governed, non-profit health care system. Group Health Research Institute changed its name from Group Health Center for Health Studies on September 8, 2009. Since 1983, the Institute has conducted non-proprietary public-interest research on preventing, diagnosing, and treating major health problems. Government and private research grants provide its main funding.
UW Medicine:
The UW Medicine health system includes UW Medical Center, Harborview Medical Center, Northwest Hospital, the UW School of Medicine, UW Medicine Neighborhood Clinics, UW Physicians, Airlift Northwest, and the UW's partnership in the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance with Seattle Children's and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. UW Medicine has major academic and service affiliations with Seattle Children's Hospital, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System in Seattle and the VA Hospital in Boise. The UW School of Medicine is the top public institution for biomedical research in funding received from the National Institutes of Health.
Source: Group Health Research Institute
Contact: Rebecca Hughes
.........
ZenMaster
For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at
http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/
Posted by ZenMaster at Thursday, September 02, 2010
Saturday, 27 March 2010
How much is a human egg worth?
How much is a human egg worth?
It is still illegal in the UK, as in most other European countries, to pay a human egg donor. However, in sunny California, and the rest of the US, it is OK to put a price on an egg. Now, the UK government regulatory agency HFEA is expected to approve payment for donating human eggs for scientific research. Should this kind of merchandise take place, or should it be done on a ‘non-profit’ basis? What do you all think? I think it’s the same question as with transplants – so feel free to include that topic too in the discussion!
In the US ‘big bucks’:
Increase in egg donors raises concerns
AP - Sun Feb 18, 1:47 PM ET
Human egg donation was a rarity not so long ago. But heightened demands for eggs — and rising compensation for donors — are prompting more young women to consider it. Jennifer Dziura, a 28-year-old New Yorker, is one of them.She received $8,000 to donate her eggs in the fall of 2005 and hopes she'll be chosen again before the private egg broker she's registered with considers her too old. She realizes prospective parents who view her profile might think it a minus that her father is adopted, allowing for little medical history from his side. She also figures some are looking for a blonde, instead of a brunette.
… and in the UK:
Women will be paid to donate eggs for science
£250 payment to aid disease research. Fears over landmark medical ruling
The Observer - Sunday February 18, 2007
Women will be paid to donate their eggs for scientific research in a landmark decision that will prompt a fierce backlash from leading figures in the medical world. The Human Fertility and Embryology Authority (HFEA), the government regulator of this highly sensitive area, is expected to approve the policy when it meets on Wednesday. At present, clinics are not allowed to accept eggs donated for scientific research unless they are a byproduct of either IVF treatment or sterilisation. Campaigners for change say that this has led to a chronic shortage of eggs for scientific use.
See also:
Asian women command premium prices for egg donation in U.S.
LA Times - May 5, 2012
Egg donors offered up to $50,000
Fees far exceed ethics guidelines, study finds
MSNBC - March 26, 2010
Human Ovulation Caught on Camera
CellNEWS - Wednesday, 18 June 2008
Most egg cells in a female body die naturally by programmed cell death
CellNEWS - Tuesday, 24 July 2007
Back to the question: How much is a human egg worth?
CellNEWS - Tuesday, 09 October 2007
.........
ZenMaster
For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at
http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/
Posted by ZenMaster at Saturday, March 27, 2010
Labels: blastocysts, cloning, donation, egg, ethics, hESCs, human, legislation, research 3 comments
Wednesday, 17 December 2008
Most Women Report Satisfaction with Egg Donation
Some claim problems
Wednesday, 17 December 2008
Two-thirds of women who donated eggs to fertility clinics reported satisfaction with the process, but 16 percent complained of subsequent physical symptoms and 20 percent reported lasting psychological effects, according to the first study to examine the long-term effects of donation.
The research by scientists at the University of Washington included women who donated eggs at clinics in 20 states and is the largest study to explore the effects of donation in the United States, where the practice is not regulated.
"We don't know how many egg donors there are because no official records are kept and reporting is on a voluntary basis to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention," said Nancy Kenney, UW associate professor of psychology and women studies and lead author of the study.
The researchers were surprised at the low number of women who reported an awareness of possible physical risk prior to donation. Nearly 63 percent viewed the potential physical risk as minor and 20 percent did not recall being made aware of physical risks at the time of their first donation.
"Many of these women may be forgetting that they were warned of the lesser risks, such as bloating and the discomfort from hormone injections," said Kenney.
"It has been quite a while since they read the material handed out by clinics or heard the risk lecture and it could be that they simple forgot. The age of the women also could be a factor. Risks don't mean much to young women. They may be discounting the risk. If you are 25 and are told that something may cause cancer when you are 45 that may seem to be forever."
Of those women who reported physical problems in the donation process, bloating, pain and cramping, ovarian hyper-stimulation, mood changes and irritability, and weight gain or loss were the most common complaints. Several women claimed infertility or decreased fertility or damage to their ovaries.
However, most of the women – 73 percent – reported being aware of some of psychological risks associated with egg donation prior to donating. These included the chance they might develop concern for or attachment to their eggs or to a potential or resulting offspring, concern that the donor or resulting child might want a future relationship with them, the possibility of having a genetic child in the world or the stress resulting from the donation process.
The women were split in their reasons for donating eggs. Nearly one-third (32 percent) said their motivations were completely based on helping others while almost 19 percent said financial concerns were their sole reason. The remainder cited a combination of altruistic and monetary factors for donation.
The research drew on the experiences of 80 women who donated eggs for the first time at least two years before filling out an 84-item questionnaire. Respondents donated eggs for the first time two to 15 years before completing the questionnaire and were an average of 30.6 years old when surveyed.
The study also found that:
Kenney said a higher percentage of women who cited altruistic reasons as their primary motivation (84 percent) reported feeling happy about their donation experiences than did the women whose decisions were mainly financial (61 percent).
"We were asking these women years later and a feeling of helping may last longer than money," she said.
"We know if clinics don't offer money most women won't donate. Great Britain, where there is no paid egg donation program, for example, has a tremendous shortage of donors. But, as one of our donors said, 'if you do this just for money, you'll be sorry.'"
Kenney noted that a number of women offered suggestions to improve the donation process and complained about unequal treatment from clinics.
"Some women talked about how they were treated like delivery suppliers. Some clinics had separate entrances at the rear for donors and poorer waiting room facilities than for egg recipients. Some said they were handed a check at the end of he procedure and told 'see you around.' Others complained that they were offered limited extra health insurance for only a very limited time after a serious procedure," she said.
See also:
Human Ovulation Caught on Camera
CellNEWS - Wednesday, 18 June 2008 What is a human egg worth - £15 or US$10,000?
Monday, 25 November 2002 How much is a human egg worth?
CellNEWS - Wednesday, 21 February 2007 Back to the question: How much is a human egg worth?
CellNEWS - Tuesday, 09 October 2007 Most egg cells in a female body die naturally
CellNEWS - Tuesday, 24 July 2007 Newcastle First to Pay for Human Eggs
CellNEWS - Wednesday, 09 January 2008 .........
The average payment was $3,965, with fees ranging from $1,104 to $7,313. (The most recent first donation year was 2002 and payments were converted to 2002 dollars).
For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/ and http://www.geocities.com/giantfideli/index.html
Friday, 5 December 2008
What to Do With Leftover Embryos?
Largest study of fertility patients shows concerns about embryo disposition Friday, 05 December 2008 Fertility patients who are done having children feel responsible for the stored, frozen embryos left over from their treatment, yet more than half are against implanting the embryos in anyone else, according to a new study by researchers at Duke University Medical Center. "This really turns our moral presumptions on their heads," says Anne Drapkin Lyerly, MD, an obstetrician/gynaecologist and bioethicist at Duke, and lead investigator of the findings that appear online in Fertility & Sterility. "Parents care very much about what happens to their embryos, but that doesn't mean they want them to become children. Our study shows that many feel they have to do what they can to prevent their embryo from becoming a child." The survey of more than 1,000 fertility patients is the largest and only multi-site study to shed important light on the state of the nation's 500,000 frozen embryos currently in storage. It reveals previously unexplored concerns that patients have about their embryos, and it comes at a time when several states and even the federal government are attempting to enact legislation that would either assert an embryo is a person, allow abandoned embryos to be adopted by another couple, or allow unused embryos to become "wards of the state." What to do with those unused embryos has also become a sticking point for providers, since they are held responsible for safe storage or disposition of apparently abandoned embryos. Fresh embryos are used in more than 80% of fertility treatment cycles, but most patients also choose to freeze some embryos that were created but not implanted, to use as a possible backup. This means that extra embryos often remain after treatment is completed. Previous studies have found that when childbearing is complete, as many as 70 percent of patients put off for five years — or more — the decision of what to do with those frozen embryos, even while they continue to pay annual storage fees. In Lyerly's study, 20 percent of the patients who had completed childbearing indicated they were likely to freeze their embryos "forever." The lack of acceptable options fuels patients' reluctance to make a decision. "Either the options they prefer aren't available or they are unacceptable," explains Lyerly. In the survey, the researchers presented four embryo disposition options: thawing and discarding; reproductive donation; indefinite freezing; and donation for research. The majority were unlikely to choose any of these options except for one: research donation. In a previous paper published in Science, Lyerly reported that 60 percent would be likely to donate unused embryos for stem cell research, an option not readily available. But even if federal policies on funding stem cell research change, Lyerly says that doesn't solve patients' conundrum. "For many of these patients, the need to make a decision about disposing these embryos is not discussed up front. Understandably, fertility patients have hard times thinking about destroying their embryos when they are emotionally and financially invested in trying to make a baby," she says. The conundrum arises when reproductive goals change without a renewed discussion about what to do with the embryos that have been stored. "Many centres don't make available all the options for disposition," Lyerly says. "Even in places where embryo research is not conducted, it's possible that embryos can be transferred to another centre, yet this might not be discussed." Two methods that were considered somewhat acceptable by about 20 percent of the fertility patients were placement of embryos in a woman's body at an infertile time, and the idea of a ritual disposal ceremony. Yet, Lyerly says these alternatives are rarely offered to patients even though "these may be the answers to many patients' desires as they allow the embryos to pass in a way that seems most respectful to them." By bringing fertility patients' concerns to the forefront, Lyerly hopes the next step will be the development of clinical guidelines and ongoing informed consent processes for patients at various stages of fertility treatment. She also hopes it will encourage more detailed disclosure about the available disposition options and facilitate broad availability of disposition decisions that are morally acceptable to the majority of fertility patients. ......... ZenMaster
For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/ and http://www.geocities.com/giantfideli/index.html
Posted by ZenMaster at Friday, December 05, 2008
Labels: blastocysts, donation, egg, embryo, ethics, human, research, US 0 comments
Thursday, 25 September 2008
What to Do With Leftover Embryos in the US?
What to Do With Leftover Embryos in the US? Thursday, 25 September 2008 The majority of infertility patients are in favour of using leftover embryos for stem cell research and would also support selling leftover embryos to other couples, according to a recent survey. The survey is published in two related studies in the September issue of the journal Fertility and Sterility. The researchers surveyed 1,350 women who presented for infertility at a large, university hospital-based fertility centre in Illinois. The survey included 24 questions on patient demographics, obstetric and infertility history, and opinions about using extra embryos for stem cell research and selling extra embryos to other couples. Assisted reproductive technology has resulted in the creation and cryopreservation of extra embryos at fertility centres across the country. It was estimated in 2002 that 396,526 embryos were in storage at US fertility clinics, according to previously published research. These embryos may be used for future pregnancy attempts, donated to other couples or agencies, given to researchers, or discarded. Because infertility patients are the gatekeepers of these leftover embryos, it is important to understand their opinions, according to Dr. Tarun Jain, University of Illinois at Chicago assistant professor of reproductive endocrinology and infertility, clinical IVF director, and lead author of the study. When asked if using leftover embryos for stem cell research should be allowed, 73 percent of the 636 respondents who stated a definitive opinion answered yes. "Infertility patients, in general, are altruistic, and it makes sense that they would try to advance medicine and help others," said Jain. African Americans and Hispanics were less likely to approve of using leftover embryos for stem cell research, compared with Caucasians. Patients younger than 30, Protestant, less wealthy and single were also less likely to support using leftover embryos for stem cell research. The researchers also asked infertility patients if they would be willing to sell their extra embryos to other couples, a practice that is considered ethically unacceptable by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. There is an emerging demand from infertility patients who cannot conceive using their own oocytes, or eggs, to purchase leftover, pre-existing embryos because it is a more cost-effective option than using an egg donor, according to the authors. When asked if selling leftover embryos to other couples should be allowed, 56 percent of the 588 respondents who stated a definitive opinion answered yes. Hispanics were less likely to approve of selling extra embryos when compared with Caucasians, but all East Indian respondents approved of the practice. Women who had never been pregnant were also less likely to approve, according to the study. The authors say this is the first survey to examine the opinions of a general infertility population related to the use of leftover embryos and to analyze the results based on the patients' socio-demographic and reproductive backgrounds. "Given the potential for a significant increase in the commoditizing of spare embryos, medical societies and policy makers may need to pay close attention to this controversial area," conclude Jain and co-author Stacey Missmer from Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School. ......... ZenMaster
For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/ and http://www.geocities.com/giantfideli/index.html
Posted by ZenMaster at Thursday, September 25, 2008
Labels: donation, egg, ethics, human, research, stem cells, US 0 comments
Monday, 4 August 2008
For Sale: Bodies, Parts, Eggs, Genes, Stem Cells
For sale: Bodies, parts, eggs, genes, stem cells Monday, 04 August 2008 Author: Donna Dickenson In the 1960s, feminists coined the slogan, "Our bodies, our selves." But that liberating sentiment has recently undergone an ironic twist. As an anonymous American woman, justifying her decision to undergo cosmetic surgery, put it, "All we have in life is ourselves, and what we can put out there every day for the world to see ... Me is all I got." The French commentator Herve Juvin extolled this new attitude towards the body in his 2005 surprise bestseller, "Lavenement du Corps" ("The Coming of the Body"). Plastic surgery, the implantation of biochips, piercings — all emblazon the belief that our bodies are our unique property. At the same time, Juvin asserts, because everyone has a body, property has suddenly become democratized. We appear to live in a time that has witnessed the absolute failure of the grand Enlightenment dreams of linear progress, universal peace, and equality between rich and poor. Together with widespread hostility to organized religion, manifested in such hugely popular books as Richard Dawkins's "The God Delusion," disappointment with social ideals means that we turn inward. In the absence of a belief in eternal life, everything becomes invested in this life, this body. Long life is our desire, eternal youth our supposed right, and the myth of the body without origin or limits our new religion. That might be why governments are so widely seen to have a positive duty to promote stem cell research and other forms of medical progress. Biotechnology industries flourish, with state sanction and support, because they add extra value to the body, the object of supreme worth to us. Indeed, the infinite renewal of the body isn't confined to superficial repairs through cosmetic surgery. External substitutes for organic structures can be surgically implanted, breaking down the barrier between the body and the outside world. At the same time, tissue removed from the body enters into commerce and trade as a commodity like any other, in the form of stem cell lines, human eggs, and other "products." The American law professor James Boyle believes that we can grasp the way in which the body has become an object of trade by likening it to the historical process of enclosure. In 18th-century Britain, land, which was previously a public resource, was "enclosed" by private owners. Freed of feudal-style legal restrictions on transfer of ownership and of traditional rights held by commoners who used communal land to pasture their animals, landholdings could now be sold to raise capital, which helped to finance the industrial revolution. In modern biotechnology, Boyle thinks, things previously outside the market — once thought to be impossible to commodify — are becoming routinely privatized. One in five human genes is now patented, even though the human genome might be thought to be our common heritage. And although Boyle doesn't mention this latest development, umbilical cord blood, taken in the final stage of labour, is now banked by profit-making firms as a potential — though unlikely — source of stem cells for the baby. In biomedicine, a series of legal cases have generated powerful momentum toward the transfer of rights over the body and its component parts from the individual "owner" to corporations and research institutions. So the body has entered the market, becoming capital, just as land did, though not everyone benefits, any more than the dispossessed commoners grew wealthy during the agricultural enclosures. Most people are shocked when they learn that one-fifth of the human genome has been patented, mostly by private firms. But why be so surprised? After all, female bodies have been subject to various forms of property-holding over many centuries and in many societies. Women's bodies are used to sell everything from cars to pop music, of course. But female tissue has been objectified and commodified in much more profound ways, in legal systems from Athens onwards. While men were also made into objects of ownership and trade, as slaves, in general women were much more likely to be treated as commodities in non-slave-owning systems. Once a woman had given her initial consent to the marriage "contract," she had no right to retract her consent to sexual relations — ever. There are clear parallels between that situation and the way in which the common law has offered little redress to patients who have tried to claim property rights in tissue taken from them. About the source: The author, Donna Dickenson, is Emeritus professor of Medical Ethics and Humanities at the University of London, was the 2006 winner of the International Spinoza Lens Award for contribution to public debate on ethics. Copyright: Project Syndicate/Institute for Human Sciences, 2008. www.project-syndicate.org ......... ZenMaster
For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/ and http://www.geocities.com/giantfideli/index.html
Posted by ZenMaster at Monday, August 04, 2008
Labels: DNA, donation, egg, ethics, genome, hESCs, human, legislation, patent, sequence, stem cells, UK, umbilical cord 1 comments
Friday, 1 August 2008
ALS iPS Cells Created from Skin Cells of Human Lou Gehrig Sufferer
Research team creates human ALS motor neurons
Thursday, 31 July 2008
A team of researchers from the Harvard Stem Cell Institute (HSCI) and Columbia University, in a collaboration catalyzed by the Project ALS/Jenifer Estess Laboratory for Stem Cell Research, has demonstrated that pluripotent stem cells generated from a patient with ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) can be directed to differentiate into motor neurons — the very brain cells destroyed by ALS. The results of the team's study appear in today's online issue of Science. This is the first published report to show that disease-specific stem cells may be derived from an individual patient.
In the study, led by Kevin Eggan, of the Harvard Stem Cell Institute, skin cells taken from a patient with a familial form of ALS were induced to become pluripotent stem cells. Scientists then differentiated the pluripotent cells into motor neurons and glia (support cells in the brain) that featured an ALS genotype.
"This is a seminal discovery," said Valerie Estess, director of research for Project ALS
"The ability to derive ALS motor neurons through a simple skin biopsy opens the doors to improved drug discovery. For the first time, researchers will be able to look at ALS cells under a microscope and see why they die. If we can figure out how a person's motor neurons die, we will figure out how to save motor neurons."
Starting in 1999, Project ALS recruited leading scientists and clinicians to define the potential role of stem cells in understanding and treating ALS, the fatal neurodegenerative disease, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease. Project ALS-funded scientists began by transplanting stem cells directly into mice with ALS, with limited success. More recent experiments have shown that stem cells may be more valuable as tools to understand the disease process and create mini-representations of disease — or assays — for the purpose of drug screening.
Patient specific motor neurons created in the Eggan laboratory. Image courtesy of John Dimos/Eggan Lab at HSCI.
"For the first time, we have the opportunity to examine cellular and molecular defects in motor neurons and glial cells derived from patients with ALS. And we can now begin drug screens on disease-specific classes of human motor neurons," said Thomas Jessell, a Howard Hughes Investigator at Columbia University, and Project ALS advisor.
"Through the work of the Jenifer Estess Laboratory for Stem Cell Research we now can glimpse the new age of ALS research, an age of progress and promise."
Co-author on the paper, Christopher Henderson, who is co-director of the Columbia University Center for Motor Neuron Biology and Disease, and senior scientific advisor to the Project ALS Laboratory, said:
"It has been a privilege to collaborate with Kevin Eggan and his team and to contribute to this critical step forward. We will continue to work hand-in-hand with Harvard researchers and Project ALS to exploit the potential of these cells for drug screening".
Three years ago, Project ALS asked Dr. Eggan, a stem cell expert, and Chris Henderson, Hynek Wichterle, as authorities on motor neuron biology and drug screening at Columbia University, to work together to understand ALS, one of our most complicated and devastating neurological disorders. Today's publication marks the first major breakthrough of this collaboration.
About Project ALS:
Project ALS is a non-profit 501©3 whose mission is to understand, treat, and cure ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease. The hallmark of the company's approach is collaboration between researchers and clinicians, many of whom have not focused on ALS specifically, or worked together before. In ten years, Project ALS has raised over $37 million for research worldwide. Located in New York, the Project ALS/Jenifer Estess Laboratory for Stem Cell is the world's only privately funded laboratory to focus exclusively on stem cell and ALS. The laboratory was named for Project ALS founder Jenifer Estess, who died from ALS in 2003.
See also:
Neurons created from skin cells of elderly patients with ALS
HSCI – July 31, 2008
Harvard-Columbia team creates neurons from ALS patient's skin cells
Eurekalert! – July 31, 2008
NY Stem Cell Foundation plays critical funding role in major new ALS research announced today
Eurekalert! – July 31, 2008
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Generated from Patients with ALS Can Be Differentiated into Motor Neurons
John T. Dimos, Kit T. Rodolfa, Kathy K. Niakan, Laurin M. Weisenthal, Hiroshi Mitsumoto, Wendy Chung, Gist F. Croft, Genevieve Saphier, Rudy Leibel, Robin Goland, Hynek Wichterle, Christopher E. Henderson, Kevin Eggan
Science July 31, 2008, DOI: 10.1126/science.1158799
.........
ZenMaster
For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/ and http://www.geocities.com/giantfideli/index.html
Posted by ZenMaster at Friday, August 01, 2008
Labels: ALS, brain, donation, human, iPS, neurons, research, SCNT, stem cells, US 0 comments
Wednesday, 9 July 2008
Human Embryonic Stem Cells Developed from 4-cell Embryo
World first may lessen ethical concerns
Wednesday, 09 July 2008
For the first time in the world scientists have succeeded in developing human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) from a single cell, or blastomere, of a 4-cell stage embryo, the 24th annual conference of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology heard today. Dr. Hilde Van de Velde, from the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium, said that their research meant that it might be possible in the future to produce hESC lines at an earlier stage without destroying the embryo.
Blastomeres are formed in the very early stages of embryonic development. About 24 hours after fertilisation the egg divides into two cells. Division into four cells occurs after 48 hours. After 96 hours, at the morulae stage, the fertilized egg has divided four to five times. During this time the size of the embryo does not increase, so the cells become smaller and smaller and they are strongly attached to each other which makes them more difficult to manipulate. At this early stage important decisions are taken: inner cells will become the foetus (including germ cells) and outer cells will become trophoblast (the outermost layer of the embryo that attaches to the wall of the uterus and serves as a nutritive pathway). There was, until now, uncertainty about which stage of early development the blastomeres ceased to be totipotent, i.e. able to develop into all cell types of the body.
Worldwide, the majority of established hESC lines have been derived from the inner cells at the blastocyst stage; these are said to be pluripotent.
"Previously, scientists have been able to derive hESC lines at the 8-cell stage," said Dr. Van de Velde, "but success rates were variable and it was necessary to culture them by mixing with established hESC lines. We have been able to derive hESCs at an earlier stage of embryonic development, and without the need for co-culture with established hESC lines. Now we have derived a second hESC from one cell of a 4-cell stage embryo. Given the complex nature of earlier attempts, we were pleased that we could develop a technique that seemed simple and was also reproducible."
The scientists used mature eggs donated by couples being treated at the University's IVF centre. Embryos were obtained after ICSI using sperm from a consenting donor. Three, good quality 4-cell stage embryos were split into 12 single blastomeres and allowed to grow in vitro to produce twelve morulaes that were cultured in the conventional way for hESC derivation. From these twelve, one resulted in a stable hESC line. The scientists concluded that at least one cell was pluripotent.
These new data confirm their recent report that at the 4-cell stage the cells are equal and totipotent.
"Now we will try to derive four hESC lines from the same embryo in order to compare the potency capacity of all four cells," said Dr. Van de Velde.
The work could have major ramifications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), by enabling the biopsy of one cell from a 4-cell stage embryo, allowing the remaining three cells to develop into a blastocyst (five day embryo) which could be transferred into the uterus and develop into a healthy baby.
"Currently, PGD is performed at the 8-cell stage, when one or two cells are removed; others have derived stable hESC lines at this stage but with low efficiency. If hESC derivation at the 4-cell stage turns out to be more efficient then at the 8-cell stage, we might consider to change our PGD policy in cases where we perform human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing," said Dr. Van de Velde.
HLA molecules play an important role in the immune system by ensuring that our bodies recognise their own cells as their own. By being able to select an HLA-identical embryo, the cord blood of the 'saviour siblings' could help cure an older brother or sister suffering from a genetic disease affecting the production and/or function of hematopoietic (blood producing) stem cells.
"We could also combine the pregnancy of an HLA-matched healthy baby with the derivation of a personal hESC line that could be used to generate in vitro hematopoietic stem cells as an additional source of hematopoietic stem cells," she said.
"We need to determine whether the removal of one cell at the 4-cell stage impairs the capacity of the embryo to develop into a healthy child in comparison with the removal of one/two cells at the 8-cell stage. We understand that some people may have ethical concerns about the production of hESCs," said Dr. Van de Velde, "but we already know from cryo-preserved embryos that the loss of one cell from a 4-cell stage embryo does not affect its capacity to implant in the womb. We believe that by making it possible to intervene at an earlier stage, and without destruction of the embryo, these ethical concerns will be diminished."
.........
ZenMaster
For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/ and http://www.geocities.com/giantfideli/index.html
Posted by ZenMaster at Wednesday, July 09, 2008
Labels: blastocysts, differentiation, donation, egg, embryonic, hESCs, human, PGD, research, stem cells 0 comments
Thursday, 15 May 2008
Help China Earthquake victims!
Help China Earthquake victims! Thursday, 15 May 2008 More than 50,000 people may have died in the earthquake that devastated parts of China on Monday, Chinese state media say. The destruction is massive in the town of Yingxiu in Wenchuan County, Sichuan Province, where Xinhua news agency has reported 7,700 people have perished, near the earthquake's epicenter.
Some places where you can help:
......... ZenMaster
For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/ and http://www.geocities.com/giantfideli/index.html
Thursday, 8 May 2008
CIRM Award Funds to Build California Stem Cell Labs
Next big investment in stem cell research in California Wednesday, 07 May 2008 CIRM, Donors and 12 California Institutions Commit $1.1 Billion to Stem Cell Research in California. The governing board of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), the state’s stem cell agency, voted today to distribute $271 million to 12 institutions to build stem cell research facilities throughout California. The institutions committed an additional $560 million from charitable donations and their internal reserves, bringing the total state-wide investment in new research space to $831 million. This leverage of the state’s stem cell funds was further increased by additional institutional commitments for faculty recruitment packages and other related capital costs. In total, the state funding will have leveraged $1.1 billion in new resources to accelerate the pace toward therapies for patients with chronic and debilitating disease and injury. Investment in research infrastructure to extend California’s state-of-the-art research capacity is a critical part of the agency’s scientific strategic plan to sustain and build California’s global leadership in stem cell research and to accelerate the field as a whole. All the institutions have agreed to expedited construction schedules that will deliver nearly 800,000 square feet of facilities with researchers in the labs within two years. This accelerated schedule should create thousands of construction jobs at a time when the state economy needs them. “This Prop. 71 stem cell research facilities program is one of the largest building programs ever dedicated for a new field of medical science and it will deliver an impact that will be felt world-wide,” commented Robert N. Klein, chairman of the governing board of the state stem cell agency. “As a patient advocate, I am inspired by the amount of leverage California research institutions have contributed from their charitable donors and from their reserves. Their incredible commitment underscores the promise that stem cell research holds for patients suffering from chronic disease and injury.” In a statement issued today, Governor Schwarzenegger said: “This will go a long way toward medical research that could save lives and improve them for people with chronic diseases. But also, this kind of public-private investment in a growing jobs sector is exactly the kind of good news our economy needs right now.” The Major Facilities Grant program was launched in August 2007 as a two-part application process. In the fall, the agency’s Scientific and Medical Research Grants Working Group evaluated the scientific merit of 17 proposals submitted in response to the request for application. On January 16, 2008 the ICOC approved Part 1 of the applications, inviting 12 institutions to advance to the second and final part of the application process. Part 2 of the application focuses on the technical aspects of an applicant’s building program and how the scientific program aligns with the CIRM’s objectives, and why the program represents a good value for California taxpayers’ investment. The review was conducted by the 10-member Scientific and Medical Research Facilities Working Group (Facilities Working Group) made up of real estate experts, patient advocates and the chairman of the ICOC. This meeting was open to the public. “These facilities will house basic and clinical researchers working collaboratively, with stem-cell-specific core labs literally ‘down the hall’ – an arrangement that is instrumental to our ability to accelerate the pace of research toward clinical application” said Dr. Alan Trounson, president of CIRM. “Because of this, we believe these facilities will be an instrumental part of advancing one of CIRM’s primary objectives of helping to speed the delivery of stem-cell based therapies and cures into the clinic and to patients.” CIRM had originally pledged to award $262 million in this round of grants, which would have taken the facilities grants by CIRM to the maximum allowed for “bricks and mortar” under Proposition 71. Today’s total of $271 million results from asking the institutions to breakout costs for scientific equipment, which CIRM routinely funds from the research portion of its bond allocation. This allowed CIRM to supplement its facilities total with $9 million from the research pool. “I was very pleased that the review process allowed us to make complete, thorough and fair evaluations of the applications,” said David Lichtenger, Chair of the CIRM Facilities Working Group (FWG), and President and CEO of Integrated Facilities Solutions (IFS) in Palo Alto. “I was also very encouraged to see that many of the applicants are at the forefront in designing innovative research space that efficiently used open and common areas to foster collaboration and flexibility in use.” “I am thrilled that there appears to be sufficient funds that all 12 proposals can move forward to completion because these facilities should dramatically accelerate the pace of getting new therapies to patients,” said David Serrano Sewell, vice chair of the CIRM FWG and Deputy City Attorney in the San Francisco City Attorney’s Office. The 12 institutions had originally requested $336 million in funding from CIRM. At its April 4 - 5 meeting the FWG scored each proposal on set criteria and then reduced each institution’s request by the percentage their score was below 100. For example, if a proposal received a 92, the institution’s request was reduced by eight percent. That reduced the funding gap from $74 million to $27 million. Moving $9 million of the requests into equipment costs reduced the gap to $18 million. This remaining gap was mitigated by offering institutions the chance to receive their award this summer at a discounted rate, rather than two years from now at completion of the projects as was initially contemplated. Eight institutions decided it was financially advantageous for them to take the award now with a nine percent reduction. This closed the gap and the remaining, relatively new and emerging institutions, could get the full funding recommended by the FWG. “California is at the epicenter of stem cell research,” said Eli Broad, founder of The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation, which has committed more than $50 million to stem cell research at the Broad Institute for Integrative Biology and Stem Cell Research at USC and the Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research at UCLA. “By creating new research centers and attracting the very best scientists from around the world, we will enable the rapid progress of one of the most promising areas of scientific and medical research today. The partnership between public institutions, the state, private foundations and donors demonstrates the unprecedented commitment California is making to stem cell research. The Broad Foundation is pleased to be the largest private donor to stem cell research in California.” "The important thing to me is that stem cells might not only extend life, but also improve the quality of life, as so many people suffer in their later years. But I think stem cells will have applications across the entire life span" stated Lorry Lokey, a donor to Stanford University’s project. Edward Thorp, a donor to the University of California, Irvine project states: "Vivian and I believe that private donations like ours in support of stem cell research at UCI will have a benefit both to our community and to our country that is immeasurably greater than the amount of the gift. Stem cell research promises to transform the treatment of disease and to give us longer, healthier lives. We expect donor support will allow continuing breakthroughs by UCI's stellar research team and that this will be leveraged by attracting many times as much in continuing state support." Ray Dolby, a donor to the University of California San Francisco project stated: “Dagmar and I are very happy to see the ongoing progress of CIRM activities and wish the project continued success." Li Ka-shing, a Hong Kong philanthropist and entrepreneur and donor to the University of California, Berkeley project stated: “When I made a gift to support the establishment of the Li Ka Shing Center for Biomedical and Health Sciences at Berkeley, I was inspired by the passage of Prop. 71 and the promise of significant advances in stem cell research. I am pleased to partner with UC Berkeley and with CIRM to support focused efforts targeting the root causes of some of today's most devastating diseases and translate discoveries into new therapies.”
(Press the picture for larger version)
The table above details the amount of funding (in US$) each applicant will receive from CIRM, the donor and institutional funds, the total building cost, the additional funds committed for faculty recruitment and other project costs, and total project costs.Major Facilities Grants The objectives of the CIRM Major Facilities Grant Program are:
- Funding new facilities – and encouraging investments by others in new facilities – that are free of any federal funding so as to allow research and development of therapies based on human embryonic stem cell (hESC) and other stem cell approaches to proceed in California without restrictions imposed by the federal government.
- Developing stem cell research centers that will expand research capacity and capabilities in California while bringing stem cell-related researchers together in a collaborative setting.
- Funding new facilities and improvements where research institutions have determined that existing facilities are inadequate or are lacking altogether and thus pose a challenge to the development of therapies and cures for diseases being addressed at these institutions.
The applications seek funding to establish one of three types of CIRM facilities:
- CIRM Institutes to carry out stem cell research in three categories: basic and discovery stem cell research, preclinical (translational) research, and preclinical development and clinical research. CIRM funding for these projects will be up to $50 million.
- CIRM Centers of Excellence to conduct stem cell research in any two of the three categories listed above. CIRM funding for these project will be up to $25 million.
- CIRM Special Program to conduct specialized stem cell projects in one of the categories listed above. CIRM funding for these project will be up to $10 million.
CIRM Grants Awarded Since the Start: Since April 2006 when the CIRM awarded its first scientific grants under the California Stem Cell Research and Cures Initiative, the Institute has funded 168 grants totalling more than $530 million for investigator-initiated research grants and training to 22 California non-profit and academic institutions.
- The first grants directed $37.5 million for training 169 pre-doctoral, post-doctoral, and clinical fellows at 16 non-profit and academic research institutions.
- In 2007 the ICOC approved 73 Leon J. Thal SEED Grants totalling more than $46 million to bring new ideas and new investigators into the field of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research;
- 28 Comprehensive Research Grants totalling nearly $72 million to support mature, ongoing studies on hESCs by scientists with a record of accomplishment in the field;
- 17 Shared Research Laboratory Grants totalling more than $50 million;
- 22 New Faculty Awards of more than $54 million to encourage the next generation of clinical and scientific leaders in stem cell research;
- and today’s Major Facilities grants to 12 institutions totalling $271 million.
About CIRM: CIRM was established in 2004 with the passage of Proposition 71, the California Stem Cell Research and Cures Act. The state-wide ballot measure, which provided $3 billion in funding for stem cell research at California universities and research institutions, was overwhelmingly approved by voters, and called for the establishment of an entity to make grants and provide loans for stem cell research, research facilities, and other vital research opportunities. To date, the CIRM governing board has approved 168 research and facility grants totalling more than $530 million, making CIRM the largest source of funding for human embryonic stem cell research in the world. .........
ZenMasterFor more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/ and http://www.geocities.com/giantfideli/index.html
Posted by ZenMaster at Thursday, May 08, 2008
Labels: biotech, California, CIRM, cloning, donation, embryonic, hESCs, human, research, stem cells, UCI, US 0 comments
Friday, 2 May 2008
New Approaches to Islet Transplantation
Studies test new approaches to islet transplantation Friday, 02 May 2008 Researchers from 11 medical centers in the United States, Canada, Sweden, and Norway have begun testing new approaches to transplanting clusters of insulin-producing islets in adults with difficult-to-control type 1 diabetes. The clinical studies, funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), will determine whether changes to current methods of islet transplantation lead to improved, long-lasting control of blood glucose with fewer side effects. In islet transplantation, clusters of islets are extracted from a donor pancreas and infused into the recipient’s liver. In a successful transplant, the islets become embedded in the liver and begin producing insulin. “A major goal of the NIH research program in type 1 diabetes is to develop therapies that replace the insulin-producing cells destroyed by the autoimmune process,” said NIH Director Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D. “These studies, which build on advances in immunology and transplantation research, may open the door to more widespread use of islet transplantation for patients with severe type 1 diabetes.” About 5 percent to 10 percent of the nearly 21 million people with diabetes have type 1, formerly known as juvenile onset diabetes or insulin-dependent diabetes. In type 1 diabetes, a person’s own immune cells attack and destroy pancreatic beta cells, which produce the hormone insulin needed for survival. Beta cells, along with several other types of cells that work together to balance blood glucose, reside in islets, also known as islets of Langerhans, in the pancreas. Three or more insulin injections a day or treatment with an insulin pump are often needed to maintain blood glucose control, but most people with type 1 diabetes still develop complications, including damage to the heart and blood vessels, eyes, nerves, and kidneys. Despite steady improvements in managing the disease, type 1 diabetes cuts lives short by about 15 years, with early deaths due mainly to heart attacks and strokes. In 2000, a research team led by Dr. James Shapiro at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, reported sustained insulin independence in seven patients transplanted with islets from two to four donor pancreases and treated with an immunosuppressive regimen that omitted glucocorticoids, thought to be toxic to islets. In the next few years, other researchers replicated the “Edmonton protocol,” and most centers adopted this approach to islet transplantation. The protocol greatly benefits some patients with severe type 1 diabetes, but two or more infusions of islets are usually needed, and the islets tend to lose their insulin-producing function over time. Participating in an islet transplant study is appropriate for people with severe hypoglycaemia (dangerously low levels of blood sugar) and for those with type 1 diabetes who have had a kidney transplant to treat kidney failure, a complication of diabetes. Since the Edmonton advance, scientists have been working to lengthen the survival of donor islets and reduce the side effects — such as anaemia, nerve and kidney damage, and vulnerability to infection — of drugs that prevent the body’s destruction of donor islets. In the new studies, the researchers will culture islets before transplantation to enhance their viability. They will also compare specific anti-rejection drugs for the ability to maximize islet survival while reducing toxicity. As the procedure becomes safer and new sources of beta cells become available, more people are likely to benefit. The researchers are conducting pilot, or phase 1/2, studies of experimental agents as well as phase 3 studies that modify the Edmonton protocol. If the phase 3 studies succeed in safely controlling blood glucose levels, the investigators may ask the Food and Drug Administration to approve the procedure for people with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes. “If these approaches are successful in prolonging islet function with less drug toxicity, type 1 diabetes patients with severe problems controlling their blood glucose may have another treatment option for controlling their diabetes,” said study chair Dr. Camillo Ricordi of the University of Miami. The studies are enrolling individuals with type 1 diabetes who have serious difficulty controlling their blood glucose despite intensive medical therapy and who suffer from episodes of severe hypoglycaemia (dangerously low levels of blood glucose). Also eligible are patients with severe hypoglycaemia and hypoglycaemia unawareness, who cannot sense a drop in blood glucose and may lose consciousness without warning. In addition, researchers are accepting type 1 diabetes patients who have had a kidney transplant and are already taking immunosuppressive drugs. The following researchers are conducting the studies: Dr. Camillo Ricordi, study chair University of Miami Dr. Christian Larsen, Emory University, Atlanta Dr. Dixon Kaufman, Northwestern University, Chicago Dr. Bernhard Hering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Dr. Ali Naji, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Dr. Peter Stock, University of California, San Francisco Dr. James Shapiro, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Dr. Jose Oberholzer, University of Illinois at Chicago Dr. Aksel Foss, University Hospital Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway Dr. Olle Korsgren, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden Dr. Annika Tibell, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden Dr. William Clarke, oversees the Consortium’s Data Coordinating Center at the University of Iowa About: For more information about the studies see the Clinical Islet Transplantation (CIT) Consortium. The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), components of the NIH, are sponsoring the studies. The studies are funded by a special Congressional funding program for type 1 diabetes research, recently extended through fiscal year 2009, which supplements the regular NIH appropriation for diabetes research. The NIDDK conducts and supports research in diabetes and other endocrine and metabolic diseases; digestive diseases, nutrition, and obesity; and kidney, urologic, and hematologic diseases. Spanning the full spectrum of medicine and afflicting people of all ages and ethnic groups, these diseases encompass some of the most common, severe, and disabling conditions affecting Americans. NIAID supports basic and applied research to prevent, diagnose and treat infectious diseases such as HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections, influenza, tuberculosis, malaria and illness from potential agents of bioterrorism. NIAID also supports research on basic immunology, transplantation and immune-related disorders, including autoimmune diseases, asthma and allergies. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) — The Nation's Medical Research Agency — includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. It is the primary federal agency for conducting and supporting basic, clinical and translational medical research, and it investigates the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. ......... ZenMaster
For more on stem cells and cloning, go to CellNEWS at http://cellnews-blog.blogspot.com/ and http://www.geocities.com/giantfideli/index.html
Posted by ZenMaster at Friday, May 02, 2008
Labels: diabetes, donation, FDA, human, research, Sweden, US 0 comments


